Know these first
- L1.4.08: Duration
- L3.8.11: Insurer asset-liability management
- L2.2.02: Market risk
Math Atoms
By the end you will be able to
- 1Apply today's relative interest rate shocks with their 1-point minimum and their silence on negative rates, and the 2027 shift-and-floor shocks that replace them.
- 2Compute the equity charge for type 1, type 2, strategic and long-term equity with the symmetric adjustment inside its limits.
- 3Charge property, spread by rating and duration, concentration over its threshold and currency, and combine all six with the matrix that switches on the interest direction.
- 4Rebuild RiskAtoms' market module of €3,391.4m and see it become €3,699.4m on the 2027 interest shocks.
Why it matters
In October 2020 almost the whole euro swap curve was below zero. Solvency II's down shock multiplied each positive rate by a factor below one and left negative rates alone, so an insurer losing money when rates fall was told it faced almost no risk. Five years later the Commission adopted the fix; it applies from 30 January 2027. On RiskAtoms' book it raises the interest charge from €393.0m to €1,529.2m, for a market module that is already 39% of the modules' sum.
Core explanation
Six shocks and a switch
Illustrative dataRiskAtoms Insurance SE, under the rules
The same made-up composite insurer as M3.8: Insurance risk, in € millions at 31 December 2025: own funds of €9,300m against a Solvency Capital Requirement of €5,000m, a ratio of 186%. Those are its booked figures and they stay so. Level 3 built the standard formula in outline; this module reads it against Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 as in force at that date, article by article. Where Level 3 stated a figure or used its own model, the “rules in outline” view computes the standard formula instead, on assumptions labelled illustrative, and shows the difference. Every policy, bond, treaty and counterparty is invented.
The market module is computed by the rules in Level 3; this lesson checks each sub-module against its article. Concentration and currency are nil on the book (diversified issuers, all in euro); the examples of each are illustrative.
Each sub-module applies one instantaneous shock and measures the fall in basic own funds: assets and liabilities both revalued (L3.8.11: Insurer asset-liability management). It is a scenario (L2.5.05: Scenario analysis), calibrated to be a 1-in-200 annual loss. Art 164 lists six and combines them:
| Sub-module | Article | Shock | RiskAtoms |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest rate | Arts 165–167 | Curve up and down by maturity | 393.0 |
| Equity | Arts 168–173 | 39% / 49% + SA; 22% strategic | 1,582.1 |
| Property | Art 174 | 25% fall | 750.0 |
| Spread | Arts 175–181 | Factor × value by rating, duration | 1,428.5 |
| Concentration | Arts 182–187 | Excess over threshold × g | 0.0 |
| Currency | Art 188 | 25% move in each currency | 0.0 |
| Market module (√s′Cs) | Art 164 | sum 4,153.6 | 3,391.4 |
Interest rate: relative shocks, and what replaces them
Today the shocks are relative: each zero rate rises by a share s_up(t) of itself, from 70% at one year to 26% at 20 years and 20% from 90 years, but by at least one percentage point (Art 166); it falls by s_down(t), from 75% to 29%, and only if it is positive (Art 167). The insurer takes the larger loss of the two. On RiskAtoms' curve, which runs from 2.00% to 2.75%, the up scenario costs €393.0m and the down €87.3m: up binds, because the bond portfolio loses more than the liabilities gain (L1.4.08: Duration).
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/269 replaces both from 30 January 2027 with the shift approach EIOPA proposed in its 2020 Opinion: a relative part plus an absolute shift b, so low and negative rates move too, and a floor on the way down of −1.25% to 7 years rising to −0.893% from 20 years. The 1-point minimum goes. The shift is in basis points against the base curve:
| Maturity | Base rate | Up, today | Down, today | Up, 2027 | Down, 2027 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1y | 2.00% | +140 | −150 | +336 | −232 |
| 2y | 2.05% | +144 | −133 | +295 | −204 |
| 5y | 2.25% | +124 | −104 | +259 | −161 |
| 10y | 2.55% | +107 | −79 | +182 | −163 |
| 15y | 2.70% | +100 | −73 | +174 | −179 |
| 20y | 2.75% | +100 | −80 | +157 | −188 |
| 30y | 2.80% | +100 | −78 | +125 | −189 |
| 50y | 3.00% | +100 | −75 | +136 | −213 |
The 2027 shocks are about twice today's on this curve. Revaluing the book on them, the up loss becomes €1,529.2m and the down €1,382.2m from 2027. Shocking only to 20 years and extrapolating beyond with the 2027 method, as the act does, gives €1,544.8m. L4.6.12: The 2025 review: Solvency II from 2027 takes the whole review.
Equity: four buckets and a dampener
Type 1 equities, listed in the EEA or OECD, fall 39% + SA; type 2, which includes private equity, 49% + SA. Strategic participations, stakes held for the long run in a related undertaking, fall 22% (Art 171), as does qualifying long-term equity (Art 171a). Type 1 and type 2 are combined with a correlation of 0.75. A 39% fall is roughly what a rise in the required return of a few points does to a dividend-discount value (L1.5.03: Valuing equities: the dividend discount model), and about 2.5 standard deviations of a 15% annual volatility (L1.5.06: Equity returns and volatility).
| Holding | Value | Shock | Loss |
|---|---|---|---|
| Listed shares (type 1) | 3,000 | 39% | 1,170 |
| Strategic participation (type 1 bucket) | 1,000 | 22% | 220 |
| Type 1 | 1,390 | ||
| Private equity (type 2) | 500 | 49% | 245 |
| Money market funds | 1,500 | look-through | not charged in Level 3 |
| √(T1² + 1.5·T1·T2 + T2²) | SA 0 | 1,582.1 |
The symmetric adjustment is ½ × (index ÷ its 36-month average − 1 − 8%), published monthly by EIOPA and kept within ±10% (Art 172). Ten per cent above average gives 1.0%; thirty per cent above gives 11%, cut to 10%; twenty per cent below gives −14%, cut to −10%. After a crash the shock falls, so insurers are not pushed to sell into it. Level 3 takes SA = 0. Across today's range the equity charge runs from €1,243.0m to €1,921.2m; with the 2027 limits of ±13%, from €1,141.2m to €2,022.9m. Treat every listed share as long-term equity and it falls to €1,076.0m, and the market module to €2,916.0m, but only if the portfolio meets the conditions: identified and managed separately, held more than five years on average, and able to avoid forced sales for ten years (five from 2027). Put options bought against the shares reduce the charge if they meet the risk mitigation rules of Arts 209–210 (L2.6.03: Hedging with options).
Property and spread
Property falls 25% (Art 174): €750m on €3,000m. Spread charges each bond its market value × a factor that rises with modified duration and falls with credit quality, set by credit quality step (Art 176; ratings in L1.4.07: Credit ratings and credit spreads). Up to five years it is b × duration; beyond, a + b × (duration − 5), and so on. Covered bonds rated CQS 0–1 get lower factors (Art 180(1)); bonds of EU Member State governments in their own currency get 0% (Art 180(2)), which is why RiskAtoms' €28,000m of government bonds carry no spread charge.
| Bond | Rating (CQS) | Value | Duration | Factor | Charge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covered bonds AAA, 4 years | AAA (0), covered | 5,000 | 3.75 | 2.63% | 131.4 |
| Corporate bonds AA, 5 years | AA (1) | 5,000 | 4.59 | 5.05% | 252.7 |
| Corporate bonds A, 4 years | A (2) | 6,000 | 3.71 | 5.20% | 312.0 |
| Corporate bonds A, 7 years | A (2) | 4,000 | 6.15 | 7.81% | 312.2 |
| Corporate bonds BBB, 3 years | BBB (3) | 6,000 | 2.80 | 7.00% | 420.2 |
| Spread | 26,000 | 1,428.5 |
Concentration and currency
Concentration charges any single name, a whole group counted as one, whose exposure E is more than a threshold CT of the asset base: XS = max(0, E ÷ Assets − CT), and the charge is Assets × XS × g, with g from 12% (CQS 0–1) to 73% (CQS 4–6) (Arts 182–186). Names are combined as the square root of the sum of squares. The base matters. Art 184 takes total assets less, among others, exposures already in the counterparty default module (cash at bank, reinsurance recoverables, receivables), deferred tax assets and intangibles: €63,700m on our reading of the book illustrative. The Module 4.6 data uses Solvency II assets less government bonds, €41,500m; government bonds carry a 0% factor instead (Art 187(3)).
| One banking group, A (CQS 2), €2,500m | Base | Threshold (3%) | Excess XS | Charge (g 21%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Art 184 base (our reading) | 63,700 | 1,911 | 0.92% | 123.7 |
| Module 4.6 outline base | 41,500 | 1,245 | 3.02% | 263.6 |
The same €2,500m name costs €123.7m on one base and €263.6m on the other illustrative; RiskAtoms holds no such name, so its charge is nil either way. Currency is the larger loss from a 25% rise or fall of each foreign currency against the euro (Art 188): €1,000m of US dollar shares would add €250m (L1.6.07: Currency risk for companies and investors). RiskAtoms holds everything in euro.
The matrix that switches
The six charges are combined as √(s′Cs) (L3.1.03: Two correlated assets). Art 164(3) sets the interest rate row by the scenario that binds: A = 0 with equity and property if the up shock is the loss, 0.5 if the down shock is. Falling rates come with falling share prices in a crisis; rising rates have less to do with them. Today the interest–spread entry follows A; from 2027 it is 0.25 in the down case.
| Interest rate | Equity | Property | Spread | Concentration | Currency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest rate | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
| Equity | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
| Property | 0.00 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
| Spread | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
| Concentration | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| Currency | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Interest rate | Equity | Property | Spread | Concentration | Currency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest rate | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
| Equity | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
| Property | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
| Spread | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
| Concentration | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| Currency | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
Had the down scenario bound with the same charges, the module would be €3,602.8m today (A = B = 0.5) and €3,563.6m from 2027, against €3,391.4m with up. Today's down matrix differs from the one shown only in B = 0.50.
The formal version
In full (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 Arts 164–188; Arts 164, 166, 167 and 172 as amended by 2026/269 from 30 January 2027):
- Each loss is the fall in basic own funds, assets less liabilities, not the fall in assets alone. Policies with profit sharing pass part of it back (L4.6.05: The standard formula: structure).
- Max and min do the work of the caps and floors (M-A11: Min, max, floors and caps); every shock is a percentage of a value or of a rate (M-A01: Percentages).
- From 2027 the SA limit is ±13%, and the interest shocks have the form shown in the walkthrough, with s and b tabled for 1 to 50 years in 2026/269.
Try it
First the curve. Move it down until rates turn negative and watch today's down shock stop and the up shock hit its 1-point minimum, while the 2027 shocks keep moving until the floor.
Try itShock the curve, today and from 2027
Show
Illustrative curve (RiskAtoms' Level 3 curve, not EIOPA's), moved in parallel. Today: r(1 + s_up), at least +1 point; r(1 − s_down) for positive rates only. From 2027: r(1 + s_up) + b_up; r(1 − s_down) − b_down, not below the floor and never above r. Shock tables to 20 years (today) and 50 years (2027), linear beyond as the rules set.
Then the module. Switch to the 2027 rules, force the down scenario to see the matrix change, push the symmetric adjustment past its limit, and move listed shares into long-term equity.
Try itBuild the market module
Rules
Interest scenario used
Illustrative, € millions. Equity: type 1 at 39% + SA on listed shares and 22% on strategic participations and long-term equity; type 2 at 49% + SA; correlated 0.75. A = 0 when the up scenario is used, 0.5 when the down is; B (interest–spread) follows A today, and is 0 or 0.25 from 2027. Other modules, operational risk and the deferred tax ratio as booked; own funds held at €9,300m.
Worked example
Three rates and the module
RiskAtoms' curve at 31 December 2025 illustrative. Rates to four decimal places.
Shocking the curve and combining the module
Step 1 of 6- 1
10 years, today
Regulatory lens
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 Arts 164–188; Directive 2009/138/EC Art 106 (symmetric adjustment) and, from 2027, Art 105a (long-term equity) as amended by Directive (EU) 2025/2. Amendments by Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/269 apply from 30 January 2027 as at 4 Nov 2026.
In the EU
In the UK
Insurers with a matching adjustment or volatility adjustment recompute the spread and interest charges with them, and an internal model may replace any sub-module (L4.6.09: Internal models, L4.6.10: Long-term guarantee measures and transitionals).
Spark Atoms
Spark AtomA down shock that went up
Spark AtomCapital and the frontier
Key takeaways
- Market risk is six sub-modules (Arts 164–188), each an instantaneous shock to own funds, combined with a six-by-six matrix whose interest entries switch with the binding scenario.
- Today's interest shocks are relative, with a 1-point minimum up and no fall for negative rates; from 2027 they add an absolute shift and a floor. On the book, €393.0m becomes €1,529.2m.
- Equity: 39% + SA (type 1), 49% + SA (type 2), 22% for strategic and long-term equity, correlated 0.75; SA within ±10%, ±13% from 2027. RiskAtoms: €1,582.1m.
- Property 25%; spread = value × factor by CQS and duration, 0% for EU Member State governments in their own currency; concentration above 3% (CQS 0–2) or 1.5% of the base; currency 25%.
- RiskAtoms' market module is €3,391.4m on a sum of €4,153.6m; on the 2027 interest shocks, €3,699.4m and a ratio of 178.7%.
Reaction
Check what stuck
Question 1 · objective 1
The 10-year zero rate is 2.55% and the up shock at 10 years is 42%. What is the up-shocked rate under today's rules, in %?
Question 2 · objective 2
An insurer holds €3,000m of listed shares and €1,000m of strategic participations. The symmetric adjustment is +5%. What is the type 1 equity charge, in €m?
Question 3 · objective 2
The equity index stands 15% above its 36-month average. What is the symmetric adjustment, in %?
Question 4 · objective 1
From 2027, the 5-year down shock is s = 40% and b = 0.71%, with a floor of −1.25%. What is the down-shocked rate if the 5-year rate is −1.0%, in %?
Question 5 · objective 3
An insurer's interest charge flips from the up scenario to the down scenario. What happens to the interest–equity correlation in the market matrix?
Glossary
- Relative shock
- Relative shock: a change proportional to the rate itself, r(1 + s). Today's interest rate shocks are relative, with a 1-point minimum on the way up and no fall for rates at or below zero (Arts 166–167).
- Shift approach
- Shift approach: the 2027 interest shocks, r(1 + s) + b up and r(1 − s) − b down, with a floor on the way down. The absolute part b moves low and negative rates too.
- Symmetric adjustment
- Symmetric adjustment (SA): a correction to the equity shock, half of the index's rise over its 36-month average less 8%, kept within ±10% (±13% from 2027). It lowers the shock after falls and raises it after rises (Art 172).
- Type 1 and type 2 equities
- Type 1 equities: listed in regulated markets of EEA or OECD countries, and some funds. Shock 39% + SA. Type 2: everything else, such as unlisted shares and private equity; 49% + SA (Art 169).
- Long-term equity
- Long-term equity: a portfolio identified and managed separately and held for more than five years on average, shocked at 22% (Arts 169, 171a). Today it must be ring-fenced and able to avoid forced sales for ten years; from 2027, five years (Directive Art 105a).
- Spread risk
- Spread risk: the loss on bonds, loans and securitisations if credit spreads widen, as market value × a factor rising with duration and falling with credit quality (Arts 175–181).
- Concentration risk
- Concentration risk: a charge on any single name (a group counts as one) above a threshold share of the asset base: 3% for CQS 0–2, 1.5% below (Arts 182–187).
- Credit quality step
- Credit quality step (CQS): the Solvency II scale 0–6 that maps external ratings: AAA is 0, AA 1, A 2, BBB 3, BB 4, B 5, lower 6.
Deep Dives & Origins
Deep Dives
- L3.1.01: Portfolio return and risk: the √(w′Σw) behind every aggregation on this page. Intermediate.
- L4.6.12: The 2025 review: Solvency II from 2027: the 2025 review, all its changes on the book at once. Advanced.
Origins
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35, Arts 164–188: EIOPA Solvency II Single Rulebook; legislation.gov.uk point-in-time text at 31 December 2020.
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/269 of 29 October 2025, Art 1 (LawPlayer copy of the Official Journal text).
- EIOPA, Opinion on the 2020 review of Solvency II, EIOPA-BoS-20/749, December 2020, section 5.1 (interest rate risk).
- EIOPA, symmetric adjustment of the equity capital charge, monthly publication.
Watch this lesson
Video version
Prefer to watch? The same lesson as a 12-minute video will sit here, made from this page's script.