Know these first
- L2.3.08: Risk culture and incentives
- L2.3.09: Conduct risk
By the end you will be able to
- 1Explain how mis-selling builds up unseen for years, and why conduct losses dominate the bank's loss data.
- 2Describe product governance from design to review, and the indicators that lead and lag customer harm.
- 3Size a redress programme as a provision and show which assumption moves it most.
- 4Explain what the FCA's Consumer Duty asks of a firm and what evidence of good outcomes looks like.
Why it matters
RiskAtoms Bank's largest loss in ten years was not a fraud, a rogue trader or an outage. It was an account sold to a million customers from 2012 to 2016. The bank provisioned £82m for redress in February 2018 and had to add £38m seventeen months later, because more customers complained than it had planned for. Those two entries are 50% of all the bank's operational losses since 2016.
Core explanation
From sales targets to redress
Illustrative dataRiskAtoms Bank plc's operational risk book
The same £67bn bank as Modules 3.5 and 3.6, at 31 December 2025: 1,107 records of losses of £10,000 or more and near misses over 2016–2025 (£240.5m of net operational losses), an RCSA of 17 key risks and 29 controls, ten key risk indicators, seven workshop scenarios and five important business services. Every event, person, supplier and figure is made up for teaching; none is any bank's data. The same book runs through every lesson in Module 3.7, so the figures agree.
Conduct is one of the bank's own risk categories, reported under the Basel event type “clients, products and business practices”. Ten years: 76 conduct losses, £128.6m net, 53% of the £240.5m total.
L2.3.09: Conduct risk defined conduct risk and told the PPI and LIBOR stories. Here the question is practical: how does a bank find conduct risk before it becomes redress, and what does it cost when it does not?
How mis-selling builds up
Conduct losses are slow. Harm is done at the point of sale, one customer at a time, and shows up years later as complaints. The bank's packaged account began to be sold in March 2012. The problem was found in September 2017, 2,023 days later: the longest gap in the book.
The packaged account: what went wrong?
Product governance
The defence is to treat a product as something with a life cycle that the firm must govern, not a launch that is then left to the sales teams.
ExploreA product's life at RiskAtoms Bank
Click a box to see what happens there.
Design
Define the target market: whose needs the product meets, and who should not buy it. Test the product with real customer profiles before launch.
Mis-selling of retail products remains one of the bank's four High residual risks (15 inherent, 10 residual). A second conduct risk, poor outcomes for customers in financial difficulty, has not moved at all (9 to 9): its only control, checking forbearance decisions against policy, is partly effective in design and in operation.
Indicators that lead, and one that lags
The book's complaints KRI has amber at 2.0 and red at 2.5 complaints per 1,000 accounts a month. It turned red only once in two years: in October 2025, at 2.64, after the payments outage had already happened. That is a lagging indicator: it counts harm done. Conduct teams pair it with indicators that move earlier: sales outside the target market, low claim rates, early cancellations, incentive pay tied to volume, and outcomes for vulnerable customers.
The Consumer Duty
The FCA's Consumer Duty (policy statement PS22/9, July 2022) moved conduct regulation from rules about the sale to evidence about outcomes. Its principle is that “a firm must act to deliver good outcomes for retail customers”, with three cross-cutting rules: act in good faith, avoid foreseeable harm, and enable and support customers to pursue their financial objectives. Four outcomes give it shape: products and services, price and value, consumer understanding, and consumer support. The board must review a report on outcomes at least once a year.
Sort itWhich outcome does this evidence speak to?
Sort each piece of management information into the Duty's outcome it best evidences.
Share of packaged-account holders over the travel insurance age limit
Claims paid as a share of premiums, by customer group
Results of testing whether customers can say what their account fee covers
Average time to close an account or cancel cover, against the time to open it
Arrears outcomes for customers flagged as vulnerable, against all customers
When it goes wrong: redress
Once a firm finds that customers were harmed, it must put them right with redress and book a provision for the cost. A redress programme is a simple model with uncertain inputs: how many customers are in scope, how many will complain or respond, how many complaints will be upheld, and what each is owed.
Public dataMotor finance redress, FCA, 30 March 2026
The FCA's final rules for a motor finance redress scheme cover 12.1 million agreements from 2007 to 2024. It assumed 75% take-up and £829 average redress: about £7.5bn, or £9.1bn with about £1.6bn of firms' running costs. At consultation the estimate had been £8.2bn, on 14.2 million agreements and 85% take-up.
The formal version
With customers in scope, response rate , uphold rate , average redress and handling cost per complaint, the provision and its sensitivity to the response rate are:
Redress on a fee-based product refunds the fees with simple interest from each payment to settlement, on average years: . For the packaged account, fees of £11 for 40 months and years:
Each percentage point of response is worth . The bank's mis-selling scenario (L3.7.06: Scenario analysis) puts a programme like this at once in 10 years, typically £40m and £300m in a severe case: an expected a year.
Try it
Set the four assumptions behind the packaged-account provision and compare your answer with what the bank booked first and what it finally cost.
Try itSize a redress provision
1,000,000 packaged accounts sold from 2012 to 2016. Set the assumptions the finance team must make before most customers have complained.
- Redress to upheld complainants£67.7m
- Handling every complaint£14.3m
- Provision£82.0m
The bank's plan assumed 20.5% would complain and got £82m. Complaints reached 30%, and the programme cost £120m. Each percentage point of response is worth about £4m: the assumption nobody can know at the start moves the answer most.
Worked example
The packaged account programme
Extra for this lessonThe redress model behind the book's two provisions (illustrative)
The book records the provisions (£82m and £38m). The inputs below are this lesson's reconstruction, chosen to match them exactly.
From discovery to the final bill
Step 1 of 5- 1
Scope
1,000,000 packaged accounts sold from March 2012 to 2016. The problem is found in September 2017, 5.5 years after the first sales.
What the conduct committee notes
Regulatory lens
- Consumer Duty. In force from 31 July 2023 for products open to sale or renewal and 31 July 2024 for closed products. It sets a higher standard than the earlier principle of treating customers fairly, and the FCA expects firms to evidence outcomes, not just processes.
- Redress. Where harm is widespread, the FCA can set up an industry scheme, as it did for motor finance in March 2026. PPI was far larger: £38.3bn paid from January 2011 to December 2019.
- Capital. Redress and conduct fines are operational losses under “clients, products and business practices”, so they enter the loss component of the standardised approach in M4.4: Counterparty, operational and large exposures. Without its redress programme, the bank's Basel internal loss multiplier would be below 1 (L3.7.07: Measuring frequency and severity).
Spark Atoms
Spark AtomThree billion dollars of sales goals
Spark AtomAn estimate that moved by £0.7bn
Key takeaways
- Conduct is 53% of the bank's ten-year losses; one mis-sold account is 50%.
- Mis-selling is created at the sale and found years later (5.5 years here); complaints are a lagging indicator.
- Product governance runs from target market and fair value through approval and sales oversight to outcome monitoring and review.
- A redress provision is customers × response × (uphold × redress + handling); the response rate moves it most (£4m a point here).
- The Consumer Duty asks firms to act to deliver good outcomes and to evidence them across four outcomes, with an annual report to the board.
Reaction
Check what stuck
Question 1 · objective 3
A bank sold 500,000 policies. It expects 20% of customers to complain, half of complaints to be upheld with £400 average redress, and each complaint to cost £60 to handle. What provision does it book, in £m?
Question 2 · objective 3
Complaints in the same programme come in at 30%, not 20%. How large is the top-up, in £m?
Question 3 · objective 2
Which of these is a leading indicator of mis-selling?
Question 4 · objective 4
Which of these is not one of the Consumer Duty's three cross-cutting rules?
Question 5 · objective 3
The FCA's motor finance redress scheme covers 12.1 million agreements. With 75% take-up and £829 average redress, roughly how much redress is that, in £bn?
Glossary
- Packaged bank account
- Packaged bank account: a current account with a monthly fee that bundles extras such as travel insurance, phone insurance and breakdown cover.
- Redress
- Redress: putting customers back in the position they would have been in, usually a refund of what they paid plus interest.
- Provision
- Provision: a liability booked for an obligation of uncertain timing or amount, at the best estimate of what it will cost (IAS 37; L3.7.13).
- Target market
- Target market: the customers a product is designed for, by their needs, characteristics and objectives; also who it is not for.
- Fair value assessment
- Fair value assessment: the firm's check that the total price a customer pays is reasonable for the benefits they get, for each group of customers.
- Consumer Duty
- Consumer Duty: the FCA's rules, in force from 31 July 2023, requiring firms to act to deliver good outcomes for retail customers.
- Lagging indicator
- Lagging indicator: a measure that moves after harm has happened, such as complaints. Leading indicators move before it, such as sales to customers outside the target market.
- Vulnerable customer
- Vulnerable customer: someone who, because of their personal circumstances, is especially likely to suffer harm, for example through ill health, a bereavement or low financial resilience.
Deep Dives & Origins
Deep Dives
- Financial Conduct Authority, PS22/9: A new Consumer Duty, July 2022. Intermediate.
- Financial Conduct Authority, Motor finance redress scheme: analyst briefing call, transcript, March 2026. Intermediate.
- US Department of Justice, Wells Fargo agrees to pay $3 billion to resolve criminal and civil investigations into sales practices involving the opening of millions of accounts without customer authorization, 21 February 2020. Introductory.
Origins
- Financial Conduct Authority, PS22/9: A new Consumer Duty, 27 July 2022; Lewis Silkin, The FCA's new Consumer Duty: Principle 12 is here, 19 August 2022; Regulation Tomorrow (Norton Rose Fulbright), FCA publishes policy statement on new Consumer Duty, 2022.
- Financial Conduct Authority, Motor finance redress scheme analyst briefing call, transcript, 30 March 2026.
- Financial Conduct Authority, Monthly PPI refunds and compensation, data page.
- US Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs, press release on Wells Fargo's sales practices settlement, 21 February 2020.
Watch this lesson
Video version
Prefer to watch? The same lesson as a 12-minute video will sit here, made from this page's script.