Core Path · L4.3.03

The curvature charge

12 minMarket risk capitalFRTBCurvatureOptions

By the end you will be able to

  1. 1Explain what the delta charge misses for options, and why the SBM adds a curvature charge.
  2. 2Compute CVR+ and CVR− for an option position by full revaluation, and link them to gamma with a second-order Taylor expansion.
  3. 3Apply the max and the floors at zero, with ψ and squared correlations, to get the bucket and class curvature charges.
  4. 4Show why the bank's long puts attract no curvature charge, while the same puts sold would attract £4.22m.

Why it matters

RiskAtoms Bank's equity desk owns 1,000 UK index puts. If the index fell 15%, their delta says they would gain £2.89m. Revalued in full they gain £7.11m: £4.22m more than delta sees. For the bank that is good news. Had it sold the puts instead, the same £4.22m would be a loss that the delta charge of L4.3.02: The sensitivities-based method: delta and vega never counted. The curvature charge counts it.

Core explanation

The bend that delta misses

Illustrative dataRiskAtoms Bank plc's capital book

The same made-up UK bank as Level 3: £67bn of assets and £4bn of equity at 31 December 2025, in £ millions. Module 4.1 adds its regulatory layer: own funds, deductions, risk-weighted assets by risk type, buffers, the leverage exposure and MREL, computed from the Level 3 credit, trading, derivatives and operational risk books. Every figure is illustrative, not any bank's data.

Pro forma. The book applies Basel 3.1, the 2017 finalisation of Basel III, to the 31 December 2025 balance sheet. On that date the bank still reported under the old UK CRR. The UK applies Basel 3.1 from 1 January 2027, and the internal model approach for market risk from 1 January 2028 (PRA PS1/26, paras 1.23 and 1.24). So the book shows the bank as it would look under the new rules.

Market risk in Module 4.3. The positions are the Level 3 trading desk (M3.2: Market risk): eight positions in four books, Equities, Rates, FX and commodities, and Credit, valued by full revaluation on eight risk factors. The client derivatives are the four netting sets of M3.4: Counterparty credit risk. The £417.7m of market risk RWA in L4.1.04: Risk-weighted assets is the sensitivities-based method only: it leaves out the default risk charge and the residual risk add-on, which this module adds. No position has been changed; where a lesson adds one to teach a rule, it is labelled illustrative.

What delta misses

The delta charge treats every position as a straight line: risk weight times sensitivity. An option's value is a curve. L1.4.09: Convexity called the bend convexity, and L3.2.06: Option Greeks across a book measured it across the desk as gamma. For a big move, the gap between the curve and the line can be large. The SBM therefore adds a curvature charge, one per risk class, alongside delta and vega. This is the separate charge for options promised in L1.7.06: Options: calls and puts and L2.5.04: Sensitivities.

Shock, revalue, subtract delta

For each risk factor, shock it up and down and revalue every position in full. For equity and FX the shock is a relative move equal to the delta risk weight; for rates, credit spreads and commodities it is a parallel shift by the highest delta risk weight in the bucket (MAR21.98–21.99). Then take away the part delta already charged, RW × s. What is left, with the sign flipped so that a loss is positive, is the curvature risk position, CVR+ for the up shock and CVR− for the down shock (MAR21.5). For the bank's puts, bucket 12, RW = 15%:

ShockIndex levelValue change V(x±) − V(x)Delta part ±RW × sCVR
Up 15%9,200−0.931−2.890−1.959
Down 15%6,8007.1082.890−4.218

Both CVRs are negative: in each direction the puts do better than delta says. Going up, they can lose no more than their £0.95m of value, while delta predicts a loss of £2.89m; going down, they gain more and more as they move into the money. That is long gamma.

Max and floors

The curvature formulas are built so that convexity can only cost capital, never earn it. Three devices do it (M-A11: Min, max, floors and caps):

  • In the squares, each CVR is floored at zero first: max⁡(CVRk,0)2\max(CVR_k, 0)^2. A negative CVR adds nothing.
  • In the cross terms, the switch ψ is 0 when both CVRs are negative, so two gains cannot combine into a negative number that cuts the charge. The correlations are the delta correlations squared (MAR21.100): 64% between two indices in bucket 12.
  • The bucket takes the worse side, Kb=max⁡(Kb+,Kb−)K_b = \max(K_b^{+}, K_b^{-}), and the whole thing sits under max⁡(0,⋅)\sqrt{\max(0, \cdot)}.

With one factor in one bucket, as on this desk, it all collapses to max⁡(max⁡(CVR+,0), max⁡(CVR−,0))\max\big(\max(CVR^{+},0),\ \max(CVR^{-},0)\big). For the bank's puts: max(0, 0) = 0. That is the zero in the SBM table of L4.3.02: The sensitivities-based method: delta and vega in every scenario, and in L4.1.04: Risk-weighted assets.

Which positions attract curvature?

The formal version

For risk factor k and instruments i with delta sensitivity siks_{ik} (MAR21.5, 21.98–21.101; the formulas are images in MAR21 and were read as text in the PRA's Market Risk: Advanced Standardised Approach (CRR) Part, Article 325g):

CVRk+=−∑i[Vi(xk(RW+))−Vi(xk)−RWk sik],CVRk−=−∑i[Vi(xk(RW−))−Vi(xk)+RWk sik]Kb±=max⁡(0, ∑kmax⁡(CVRk±,0)2+∑k∑l≠kρkl CVRk± CVRl± ψ(CVRk±,CVRl±))Kb=max⁡(Kb+,Kb−),Sb=∑kCVRk± (the side that set Kb)Curvature=max⁡(0, ∑bKb2+∑b∑c≠bγbc Sb Sc ψ(Sb,Sc))\begin{aligned} CVR_k^{+} &= -\sum_i \Big[ V_i\big(x_k^{(RW+)}\big) - V_i(x_k) - RW_k\, s_{ik} \Big], \qquad CVR_k^{-} = -\sum_i \Big[ V_i\big(x_k^{(RW-)}\big) - V_i(x_k) + RW_k\, s_{ik} \Big] \\ K_b^{\pm} &= \sqrt{\max\Big(0,\ \sum_k \max\big(CVR_k^{\pm}, 0\big)^2 + \sum_k \sum_{l \ne k} \rho_{kl}\, CVR_k^{\pm}\, CVR_l^{\pm}\, \psi\big(CVR_k^{\pm}, CVR_l^{\pm}\big)\Big)} \\ K_b &= \max\big(K_b^{+}, K_b^{-}\big), \qquad S_b = \sum_k CVR_k^{\pm} \ \text{(the side that set } K_b\text{)} \\ \text{Curvature} &= \sqrt{\max\Big(0,\ \sum_b K_b^2 + \sum_b \sum_{c \ne b} \gamma_{bc}\, S_b\, S_c\, \psi(S_b, S_c)\Big)} \end{aligned}
  • xk(RW±)x_k^{(RW\pm)}: risk factor k shocked up or down by the curvature risk weight; ψ(x,y)=0\psi(x, y) = 0 if x<0x < 0 and y<0y < 0, else 1.
  • ρkl\rho_{kl} and γbc\gamma_{bc}: the delta correlations, squared (MAR21.100–21.101), then moved for each correlation scenario as in L4.3.02: The sensitivities-based method: delta and vega. If Kb+=Kb−K_b^{+} = K_b^{-}, the side with the larger sum of CVRs is used.
  • The link to gamma is a second-order Taylor expansion (M-B03: Taylor expansion): V(x+h)−V(x)−hV′(x)≈12h2V′′(x)V(x+h) - V(x) - h V'(x) \approx \tfrac12 h^2 V''(x), so CVR±≈−12 Γ (RW x)2CVR^{\pm} \approx -\tfrac12\, \Gamma\, (RW\, x)^2, the same on both sides. The exact CVRs differ on each side because gamma itself changes over a 15% move.

Try it

Start with the bank's puts: two green gaps, no charge. Switch to sold and the gaps turn red. Then shrink the shock to 5% and watch the Taylor estimate close in on the exact CVRs; raise the volatility and see the curve flatten.

Try itCurvature of a put position

Position

−5.86.518.8−30%−15%0%+15%+30%Move in the UK indexCVR+ −1.96CVR− −4.22
Full revaluation P&L (£m)Delta line: s × moveGreen gap: CVR below 0, no charge. Red gap: CVR above 0, charged.
Delta sensitivity s (£m per 100%)−19.268
RW × s−2.890
V(up) − V−0.931
V(down) − V7.108
CVR+ = −[V(up) − V − RW·s]−1.959
CVR− = −[V(down) − V + RW·s]−4.218
Taylor: −½ Γ (RW·S)²−3.490
Charge = max(CVR+, CVR−, 0)£0.000m

Both CVRs are negative: the option gains more (or loses less) than its delta says in both directions. Long gamma never attracts a curvature charge.

One risk factor in one bucket, so the bucket charge is simply the larger of max(CVR+, 0) and max(CVR−, 0). Black-Scholes revaluation with the desk's inputs; illustrative, £ millions.

Worked example

The bank's puts, bought and sold

£ millions. UK index at 8,000, 1,000 puts at £10 a point, strike 7,600, three months, implied volatility 16%.

From the puts to the charge

Step 1 of 6
  1. 1

    Delta

    The delta sensitivity to the index, per 100% relative move, is s = −19.268. Delta and vega charges already use it (L4.3.02: The sensitivities-based method: delta and vega).

Regulatory lens

Curvature is MAR21.5 and MAR21.96–21.101. Statements on jurisdictions are as at 3 November 2026 as at 3 Nov 2026.

In the UK

The PRA's Market Risk: Advanced Standardised Approach (CRR) Part, Article 325g, has the same CVR formulas, the floors, ψ, and the rule that K_b+ applies when the two sides are equal and the sum of CVR+ exceeds the sum of CVR−. It applies from 1 January 2027 (PS1/26, para 1.23). Until then the old UK CRR charges option convexity through its own rules on the non-delta risk of options (Delegated Regulation (EU) No 528/2014 as it applies in the UK).

In the EU

CRR3 has the same curvature charge within the SBM, under the EU's postponed timetable and its 0.9 multiplier on the SBM result from 1 January 2027 to 31 December 2029 (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1221, Article 495s). See L4.3.11: Market risk and CVA capital: what changes from 2027.

In the US

The US proposals of 19 March 2026 would introduce a standardised approach for market risk (Federal Reserve fact sheet); as far as we could find, no final rule had been published by 3 November 2026.

Spark Atoms

Spark AtomLong options: charged for delta and vega, never for curvature
The bank's puts cost £1.54m of vega capital and feed the equity delta charge, but no curvature capital, however much gamma they have. The asymmetry is deliberate: curvature exists to catch the seller who looks hedged on delta and is not.
Spark AtomWhy not just use gamma?
Gamma is a local measure: it describes a move of a point or two, not 15%. Over the rule's shock the puts' gamma changes a lot, and the exact CVRs (−1.96 and −4.22) sit on either side of the gamma estimate (−3.49). Full revaluation also captures barriers and digitals, where gamma can flip sign within the shock.

Key takeaways

  • Delta is a straight line; options bend. The curvature charge catches the loss beyond delta when each risk factor is shocked by its risk weight.
  • CVR± = −[V(x±) − V(x) ∓ RW × s], from full revaluation; by Taylor, about −½ Γ (RW·x)².
  • Floors at zero, ψ and K_b = max(K+, K−) mean convexity can only add capital: long gamma earns no credit.
  • The bank's long puts: CVR+ −1.959, CVR− −4.218, charge 0. The same puts sold: £4.218m, set by the down shock.
  • Correlations in the curvature formulas are the delta correlations squared, moved by the same three scenarios.

Reaction

Check what stuck

Question 1 · objective 2

A position on one equity index (risk weight 15%) has delta sensitivity s = −20 (£m per 100%). Revalued, a +15% move changes its value by −4.0 and a −15% move by +1.5. What is its curvature charge, in £m?

£m

Question 2 · objective 3

An option book on one index has CVR+ = −2.0 and CVR− = −3.1 (£m). What is its curvature charge, in £m?

£m

Question 3 · objective 2

Why does the curvature shock for an equity index move the index by 15%?

Question 4 · objective 1

The desk's £60m of UK index futures are shocked by ±15%. What are their CVRs?

Question 5 · objective 3

Two equity indices in bucket 12 have a delta correlation of 80%. What correlation joins their CVRs in the curvature charge (medium scenario)?

Glossary

Curvature charge
Curvature charge: the SBM's charge for the part of an option's move that delta does not capture, measured by full revaluation under an up and a down shock.
Curvature risk position (CVR)
Curvature risk position (CVR): minus the loss beyond delta when a risk factor is shocked by its risk weight. Positive means the position loses more than delta predicts.
Convexity
Convexity: the bend in a value curve. A convex position gains more than its delta says when the market moves either way.
Gamma
Gamma: the second derivative of value with respect to the underlying. Long options have positive gamma, short options negative.
ψ (psi)
ψ (psi): a switch in the curvature formulas that is 0 when both CVRs in a cross term are negative and 1 otherwise, so two gains cannot offset anything.

Deep Dives & Origins

Deep Dives

Origins

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, MAR21: Standardised approach: sensitivities-based method, paras 21.5, 21.77, 21.78, 21.80 and 21.98–21.101, bis.org.
  • Prudential Regulation Authority, PRA Rulebook, Market Risk: Advanced Standardised Approach (CRR) Part, Article 325g, version from 1 January 2027; PS1/26, para 1.23, January 2026.
  • Bank of England, Market Risk: Standardised Approach policy page, listing Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 528/2014 of 12 March 2014 on the non-delta risk of options (legislation.gov.uk).
  • Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1221, Article 495s, Official Journal of the European Union, 2026.
  • Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Fact sheet on the capital proposals, 19 March 2026.

Watch this lesson

Video version

Prefer to watch? The same lesson as a 12-minute video will sit here, made from this page's script.