Core Path · L3.5.12

Liquidity beyond banks

12 minLiquidity riskLDIOpen-ended fundsSwing pricingCCP liquidity

Know these first

By the end you will be able to

  1. 1Explain how margin calls turn market moves into cash needs for pension schemes and insurers, and how a liquidity waterfall meets them.
  2. 2Explain why open-ended funds that deal daily in slow-to-sell assets are fragile, and how suspension, swing pricing and notice periods work.
  3. 3Test a CCP's liquid resources against the default of its largest members, and explain why members' own credit lines fall away.
  4. 4Name the rules that now apply to each, and say where non-banks' liquidity needs land on a bank's book.

Why it matters

L3.4.09: The risks CCPs bring told the story of September 2022 from the margin side: gilt yields jumped and pension schemes' hedges called for collateral. Now look at it from the schemes'. Most were not in trouble on paper; higher yields made their liabilities cheaper. Their problem was time. In his letter to the Treasury Committee of 18 October 2022, the Bank of England's Deputy Governor, Sir Jon Cunliffe, wrote that LDI funds had raised “tens of billion pounds in capital” from schemes and made “many billion pounds of gilt sales”, and that pooled funds, with many smaller investors, were likely to take longer to raise it than schemes with their own accounts. Liquidity risk is not only a bank problem. Anyone who must pay cash on time, from assets that take time to sell, has it.

Core explanation

Three ways to need cash fast

Illustrative dataRiskAtoms Bank plc's liquidity book

A £67bn balance sheet on one made-up reporting date, in pounds: every line's contractual maturity, its HQLA level, LCR rate and NSFR factors, the undrawn facilities and collateral triggers, and a daily 90-day stress test in three scenarios. The numbers are round illustrative values, not any bank's data, and the cash flows are principal only (no interest). The same book runs through every lesson in Module 3.5, so the figures agree.

Extras for this lesson: Ebbsworth Pension Trustees' whole hedge and liquidity waterfall (the scheme from Module 3.4), the RiskAtoms Property Income Fund, Wexcombe Clearing House's liquid resources (the CCP of L3.4.08: Central counterparties) and an unnamed UK life insurer. All are illustrative. The bank's side is in its own book: £3.0bn of deposits from banks and other financial institutions, which the LCR assumes leave in full when due, and £300m for its largest 30-day collateral outflow, plus £400m more after a downgrade.

Banks have depositors who can leave. Other firms have their own versions. Pension schemes and insurers have margin calls: derivatives and repo that demand collateral when markets move. Investment funds have redemptions: investors who can ask for their money back every day. Clearing houses have payment obligations: they must pay the winners on time even when a loser has defaulted. Each is a liquidity mismatch: a promise to pay fast against assets that may be slow.

1. Pension schemes: the funding side of LDI

Ebbsworth's liabilities are worth £1,600m, with a PV01 of £2.56m per basis point. Its LDI hedge, swaps and gilt repo (the swap with RiskAtoms Bank in L3.4.09: The risks CCPs bring is one part), has a PV01 of £2.0m: it hedges 78% of the rate risk. If yields rise by 250bp the scheme's funding improves, but the hedge calls £500m of collateral. The collateral buffer already in the LDI fund, £200m, covers 100bp. Beyond that the trustees work down a liquidity waterfall:

ExploreEbbsworth's liquidity waterfall

Illustrative. The scheme's hedge has a PV01 of £2.0m per basis point, so each 1bp rise in gilt yields calls £2.0m of collateral.

Cash needed by the end of day

  • Collateral buffer held in the LDI fundday 0 · £200m · uses £200m
  • Scheme cash and money market fundday 1 · £60m · uses £60m
  • Sponsor's liquidity facilityday 2 · £50m · uses £50m
  • Corporate bondsday 3 · £300m · 3% cost
  • Global equitiesday 4 · £350m · 2% cost
  • Property and private creditmonths · £340m
Collateral called£500m
Raised in time£310m
Cost of selling£0.00m
Largest rise it can meet in time155bp
Hedge kept£190m short: the manager cuts the hedge

The property and private credit at the bottom of the waterfall count in the scheme's funding level but not here: they take months to sell. Moving the deadline from two days to four almost triples the rise the scheme can meet.

Within two days only 3 sources are ready: £310m, £190m short. The LDI manager then has to cut the hedge, selling gilts into a falling market, exactly what happened at scale in 2022. Given until day 3, the scheme meets the call by selling corporate bonds, for £5.88m of sale costs. The same assets support a rise of 155bp within two days, but 472bp within four. The scheme is rich; it is not quick.

Since April 2023 The Pensions Regulator's guidance asks schemes using LDI for a market stress buffer of at least 250bp on top of an operational buffer, top-ups achievable within five business days, a documented waterfall and enough authorised signatories. With TPR's example operational buffer of 100bp, Ebbsworth would hold £700m in its LDI fund rather than £200m.

2. Insurers: the same calls, more sources

Life insurers use swaps, currency forwards and repo to hedge annuity books and foreign bonds, so they face the same calls, alongside claims and policyholders who surrender. An illustrative month in a market stress for a UK life insurer:

Cash flow in the stressed month£m
Annuity and pension payments−£140m
Claims on general insurance−£90m
Surrenders on savings policies (doubled in the stress)−£160m
Variation margin on currency hedges (sterling falls 8%)−£240m
Variation margin on interest rate swaps (yields rise 100bp)−£110m
Premiums£170m
Coupons and maturing bonds£120m
Net outflow−£450m
Capacity: cash and money market funds£180m
Capacity: gilts that can be posted or repoed£600m
Capacity: corporate bonds sold at a 4% discount£288m
Counterbalancing capacity£1,068m

Capacity covers the net outflow 2.37 times. Collateral calls are £350m, 47% of the outflows: together the largest item, and the one that arrives first. This is the layout the PRA now asks larger insurers to report every month.

3. Open-ended funds: redemptions

An open-ended fund that deals daily promises investors cash within days, but may own assets that take months to sell. When too many ask at once, it can suspend dealing. After the EU referendum, Standard Life suspended its UK property fund on Monday 4 July 2016, and Aviva Investors (whose fund was £1.8bn) and M&G followed the next day. In March 2020 many property funds suspended again, this time because valuers could not put a reliable value on buildings. And in June 2019 the Woodford Equity Income Fund, which had peaked at over £10.1bn in May 2017 and fallen to £3.6bn, suspended with only 8% of its investments sellable within seven days.

Who pays when a fund sells in a hurry?

4. Clearing houses: paying the winners

A CCP collects variation margin from losers and pays it to winners the same day. If a member defaults, its payment does not arrive but the CCP must still pay. The default fund of L3.4.08: Central counterparties covers the loss; the CCP also needs cash, on the day, in the right currency. It counts only qualifying liquid resources, and a credit line from a member is worthless if that member is the one defaulting.

Sort itCan a CCP count it as a qualifying liquid resource?

Sort each resource: something a CCP can count towards its liquidity need, or something it cannot rely on.

  • Cash in its account at the central bank

  • A committed repo line from a creditworthy bank that is not a defaulting member

  • An uncommitted credit line from a bank

  • A committed line from the member that has just defaulted

  • Gilts held in custody with prearranged, highly reliable funding

  • Equities posted by members, with no arrangement to sell or repo them

The formal version

For a scheme with hedge PV01 PP, a yield rise Δy\Delta y and sources ii of size AiA_i, ready on day did_i at sale cost cic_i:

call=P×Δyraised(D)=min⁡(call,  ∑i : di≤DAi(1−ci))resilience(D)=∑i : di≤DAi(1−ci)P\begin{aligned} \text{call} &= P \times \Delta y \\ \text{raised}(D) &= \min\Big(\text{call},\; \textstyle\sum_{i\,:\,d_i \le D} A_i (1 - c_i)\Big) \\ \text{resilience}(D) &= \frac{\sum_{i\,:\,d_i \le D} A_i (1 - c_i)}{P} \end{aligned}

For a fund with mid value per unit mm and swing factor ss (the cost of selling), a redeemer is paid m(1−s)m(1 - s). For a CCP with payment obligations O1≥O2≥…O_1 \ge O_2 \ge \dots on a stress move and resources RR, of which LjL_j come from member jj:

Cover 2:O1+O2  ≤  R−L1−L2\text{Cover 2:}\quad O_1 + O_2 \;\le\; R - L_1 - L_2

The same shape as a bank's survival horizon in L3.5.05: Liquidity stress tests and survival horizons: what must be paid by when, against what can be raised by when. Only the names change.

Try it

Run a redemption wave at the RiskAtoms Property Income Fund. Change its size and length, switch swing pricing on, and add a notice period.

Try itRun on a property fund

Swing pricing

Notice period

0%5%10%15%10203040506070Day
Cash, share of the fundOperating minimum
Dealingsuspended on day 6
Paid to redeemers£96.1m
Requests trapped£17.9m
First redeemer gets, per £1 unit100.0p
A unit held to the end is worth99.0p
Lowest cash share2.6%
Property sale cost7%

Without swing pricing, redeemers leave at the full value and the 7% cost of selling the buildings falls on those who stay. With it, redeemers pay that cost themselves. A notice period long enough for the sales to complete avoids suspension altogether.

Worked example

Wexcombe Clearing House's liquidity test

Cover 1 and Cover 2, in both directions

Step 1 of 5
  1. 1

    The move and the resources

    Wexcombe Clearing House stresses swap rates by 100bp each way. A member owes variation margin of its PV01 times the move. Resources: £50m cash at the central bank and three committed repo lines of £35m, from Kestermoor, Pellbridge, RiskAtoms: £155m in all.

What Wexcombe Clearing House's risk team notes

Cover 2, rates down 100bp: Kestermoor and RiskAtoms default, obligations £91.6m, qualifying resources £85m once their own lines are excluded. Shortfall £6.6m. Replace one member line with a non-member bank's line before the next review.

Regulatory lens

Pension schemes. After the Financial Policy Committee's recommendation of March 2023, The Pensions Regulator issued guidance on 24 April 2023: a market stress buffer of at least 250bp over an operational buffer, top-ups achievable within five business days, a documented waterfall, liquidity facilities only if documented and reviewed, and stress tests that include decision times. The FCA issued matching guidance to LDI managers. Insurers. The PRA's PS15/25 of 30 September 2025 brings in monthly liquidity reporting from 30 September 2026 for larger Solvency II insurers (average assets over £20bn with large derivative or securities financing books), including a cash flow mismatch with counterbalancing capacity and an adverse market scenario. It cites the 2022 LDI episode and the March 2020 dash for cash.

Funds. In the UK, the FCA's rules for funds investing in inherently illiquid assets, in force since 30 September 2020, require liquidity risk plans and clearer disclosure, and suspension when an independent valuer finds material uncertainty over the value of more than 20% of the fund, unless the manager and the depositary agree that dealing on is in investors' best interests. The FSB and IOSCO's policies of 20 December 2023 group open-ended funds by the liquidity of their assets, with redemption terms to match, and expect anti-dilution tools that charge redeeming investors the estimated cost of liquidity. In the US, the SEC has permitted swing pricing for open-end funds other than money market funds and ETFs since 19 November 2018. CCPs. The Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures of April 2012 (CPSS-IOSCO, now CPMI-IOSCO) set the liquidity standard national rules build on: enough qualifying liquid resources for the default of the participant that would cause the largest payment obligation, and a CCP that is complex or systemically important in several jurisdictions should consider holding enough for the two largest. Some national rules, such as New Zealand's, make that a requirement.

Spark Atoms

Spark AtomEight per cent in a week
When the Woodford Equity Income Fund suspended in June 2019, the FCA found that only 8% of its investments could be sold within seven days, while investors could ask for their money every day. In August 2025 the FCA announced provisional fines of £5,888,800 for Neil Woodford and £40m for his firm, which both referred to the Upper Tribunal. The FCA had earlier secured a £230m redress scheme for investors stuck in the fund, through its case against Link Fund Solutions.
Spark AtomRich and stuck
Ebbsworth's waterfall holds £1,300m against a £500m call, and still falls short in two days. Liquidity is never about how much you own. It is about how much you can turn into cash by when.

Key takeaways

  • Liquidity risk is any promise to pay fast backed by assets that are slow: margin calls for schemes and insurers, redemptions for funds, payments for CCPs.
  • Ebbsworth's hedge calls £500m on a 250bp rise: £310m can be raised in two days, the whole call in three at a cost of £5.88m.
  • A daily-dealing property fund hit by 2% a day of redemptions suspends on day 6; swing pricing makes redeemers pay the cost of selling, and a notice period avoids the suspension.
  • Wexcombe Clearing House meets Cover 2 when rates rise but is £6.6m short when they fall, because the two defaulters also provide its credit lines.
  • New rules follow each episode: TPR's buffers after LDI, the FCA's illiquid asset fund rules and FSB/IOSCO's anti-dilution tools for funds, PRA liquidity reporting for insurers.

Reaction

Check what stuck

Question 1 · objective 1

In September 2022 many UK defined benefit schemes became better funded as gilt yields rose, yet some came close to losing their hedges. Why?

Question 2 · objective 1

A scheme's LDI hedge has a PV01 of £3m per basis point. Gilt yields rise by 250bp. Roughly how much collateral is called, in £m?

£m

Question 3 · objective 2

A property fund's mid price is 100p. On a day of net redemptions it swings its price by 5%. At what price, in pence, are redeemers paid?

p

Question 4 · objective 3

A CCP's two largest payment obligations on a stress move are £60m and £45m. It has £120m of qualifying liquid resources, of which £30m is a committed line from one of those two members. By how much does it miss Cover 2, in £m?

£m

Question 5 · objective 2

Which change best addresses the mismatch in a daily-dealing fund that holds commercial property?

Glossary

Liability-driven investment
Liability-driven investment (LDI): a pension scheme strategy that uses swaps and gilt repo to match the interest rate and inflation sensitivity of its liabilities with less capital than buying the gilts outright.
Collateral buffer
Collateral buffer: cash and gilts held in an LDI fund or mandate to meet collateral calls, measured as the rise in yields it can absorb. TPR's guidance splits it into an operational buffer and a market stress buffer.
Liquidity waterfall
Liquidity waterfall: the order, agreed in advance, in which a scheme or fund will use its sources of cash to meet collateral calls, with who may act and how fast each source can be turned into cash.
Open-ended fund
Open-ended fund: a fund that issues and redeems units on demand, at a price based on the value of its assets, usually every dealing day.
Suspension
Suspension: stopping all dealing in a fund's units, so that nobody can redeem (or buy) until it reopens.
Swing pricing
Swing pricing: moving the price at which investors deal away from the mid value when there are net redemptions (or subscriptions), so that those who trade bear the cost of the buying or selling they cause.
Notice period
Notice period: a delay between asking to redeem and being paid, set so the fund has time to sell assets in an orderly way.
First-mover advantage
First-mover advantage: the gain to investors who redeem early, at a price that does not yet reflect the cost of selling assets, at the expense of those who stay.
Cover 2
Cover 2: a standard requiring a CCP to hold enough resources for the default of the two members that would cause it the largest need, in extreme but plausible markets.
Qualifying liquid resources
Qualifying liquid resources: what a CCP may count towards its liquidity need: cash at the central bank or creditworthy banks, committed credit lines, committed FX swaps and repos, and highly marketable collateral with prearranged funding.

Deep Dives & Origins

Deep Dives

  • J. Cunliffe, letter to the Chair of the Treasury Committee on the Bank of England's gilt market operation, Bank of England, 18 October 2022. Introductory.
  • Financial Stability Board and IOSCO, revised policy recommendations on liquidity mismatch in open-ended funds and guidance on anti-dilution liquidity management tools, 20 December 2023. Intermediate.

Origins

  • J. Cunliffe, Bank of England, letter to Rt Hon Mel Stride MP, Chair of the Treasury Committee, 18 October 2022.
  • Travers Smith, “Lessons from the LDI crisis: new TPR and FCA guidance on enhancing the resilience of LDI”, 2023 (summarising The Pensions Regulator's guidance of 24 April 2023).
  • Prudential Regulation Authority, PS15/25 Closing liquidity reporting gaps and streamlining standard formula reporting, 30 September 2025.
  • Financial Conduct Authority, “FCA fines over Woodford Equity Income Fund”, press release, 5 August 2025.
  • Financial Conduct Authority, “FCA confirms new rules for certain open-ended funds investing in inherently illiquid assets”, press release, 30 September 2019 (PS19/24).
  • CNBC, “More pain to come for UK property funds”, 5 July 2016.
  • Association of Real Estate Funds, fund suspensions due to material valuation uncertainty, 2020.
  • Financial Stability Board, “FSB and IOSCO publish policies to address vulnerabilities from liquidity mismatch in open-ended funds”, 20 December 2023.
  • US Securities and Exchange Commission, investment company swing pricing, final rule, 13 October 2016.
  • CPSS (now CPMI) and IOSCO, Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures, April 2012, Principle 7; Reserve Bank of New Zealand and Financial Markets Authority, FMI Standard 7: Liquidity risk, 1 March 2024.

Watch this lesson

Video version

Prefer to watch? The same lesson as a 12-minute video will sit here, made from this page's script.