Know these first
- L2.2.03: Credit and counterparty risk
Math Atoms
By the end you will be able to
- 1Compute expected loss for a loan and for the bank's corporate and retail books.
- 2Explain expected loss as an expectation over outcomes, and why it adds up across a portfolio.
- 3Build a risk-based loan price from funding, expected loss, costs and a return on capital.
- 4Use RAROC to judge a proposed price, and explain why one price for all borrowers fails.
Why it matters
Graybeck Plastics owes RiskAtoms Bank £12m: about 2% of the corporate book. Yet it accounts for 36% of the book's expected loss. Expected loss is the cost of lending that the bank knows about in advance. It has to be priced into every loan and set aside in provisions, and it shows at once where the risk in a book sits.
Core explanation
The average loss, and what it costs
Illustrative dataRiskAtoms Bank plc's credit book
One made-up lending book on one made-up date (31 December, year 0), in pounds: a ten-grade master scale, a one-year rating transition matrix, twelve invented corporate borrowers (£587m of exposure, expected loss £2.81m), retail portfolios and twenty past workout cases. The firms are invented and the numbers are round illustrative values, not anyone's data. The same book runs through every lesson in Module 3.3.
The three parameters of the last three lessons meet here. Expected loss (EL) is , a one-year figure unless stated (L2.2.03: Credit and counterparty risk). For the twelve corporate borrowers, with PDs from the master scale (L3.3.04: Internal ratings and master scales), LGDs after collateral (L3.3.08: Loss given default and recovery) and EADs after CCFs (L3.3.09: Exposure at default):
| Borrower | Grade | PD | LGD | EAD | EL | Share of EL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graybeck Plastics Ltd | 9 | 11.31% | 75.0% | £12.00m | £1,017.9k | 36.2% |
| Hastemoor Construction Ltd | 8 | 4.53% | 55.0% | £24.25m | £604.2k | 21.5% |
| Bramwick Stores plc | 6 | 1.13% | 45.0% | £76.00m | £386.5k | 13.7% |
| Larkhollow Freight Ltd | 7 | 2.26% | 35.1% | £29.00m | £230.1k | 8.2% |
| Vellacourt Hôtels SAS | 7 | 2.26% | 21.7% | £39.00m | £191.2k | 6.8% |
| Mirefield Care Homes Ltd | 6 | 1.13% | 19.3% | £44.25m | £96.5k | 3.4% |
| Quorrel Systems BV | 5 | 0.57% | 45.0% | £30.00m | £77.0k | 2.7% |
| Pellcourt Properties Ltd | 5 | 0.57% | 10.9% | £120.00m | £74.4k | 2.6% |
| Thornvale Engineering Ltd | 4 | 0.28% | 31.0% | £52.50m | £45.6k | 1.6% |
| Ostreth Energie GmbH | 3 | 0.14% | 40.0% | £70.00m | £39.2k | 1.4% |
| Sallowmere Logistics GmbH | 4 | 0.28% | 30.8% | £45.00m | £38.9k | 1.4% |
| Cindral Pharma Inc | 2 | 0.07% | 40.0% | £45.00m | £12.6k | 0.4% |
| Corporate book | £587m | £2.81m | 100% |
The book loses 0.48% of its exposure in an average year: its EL rate. Two weak borrowers, Graybeck and Hastemoor, hold 6% of the EAD and 58% of the EL. The large, well-rated, secured loans barely register. Retail is a much bigger book with a similar EL rate:
| Retail segment | EAD | PD | LGD | EL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortgages: LTV up to 60% | £1,470m | 0.3% | 5% | £0.22m |
| Mortgages: LTV 60–80% | £1,640m | 0.6% | 12% | £1.18m |
| Mortgages: LTV 80–95% | £710m | 1.5% | 20% | £2.13m |
| Personal loans: Score band A | £190m | 1.2% | 65% | £1.48m |
| Personal loans: Score band B | £130m | 3.5% | 70% | £3.19m |
| Personal loans: Score band C | £50m | 9.0% | 75% | £3.38m |
| Credit cards: Transactors | £91m | 0.8% | 80% | £0.58m |
| Credit cards: Revolvers | £204m | 4.5% | 85% | £7.80m |
| Retail | £4,485m | £19.96m |
Retail loses 0.45% a year on average, and the bank as a whole expects to lose £22.8m a year. Mortgages are most of the retail exposure, but cards and personal loans, with high PDs and LGDs, carry most of its expected loss.
An expectation, not a forecast
Expected loss is an expectation in the sense of M-C02: Expectation: a probability-weighted average over everything that can happen. Take Bramwick Stores plc, and suppose that if it defaults, the bank loses either 30% (a quick sale of the business) or 60% (a long administration), equally likely:
| Outcome | Probability | Loss | Probability × loss |
|---|---|---|---|
| No default | 98.870% | £0.0m | £0 |
| Default, quick sale (LGD 30%) | 0.565% | £22.8m | £128,820 |
| Default, long administration (LGD 60%) | 0.565% | £45.6m | £257,640 |
| Expected loss | £386,460 |
The average LGD is 45%, so EL is the same £386,460 as before. But in 98.9% of years the loss is zero, and otherwise it is £22.8m or more. The standard deviation of the loss is £3.81m, about 10 times the EL. Expected loss is the cost the bank charges for and provides for; the spread around it is unexpected loss, which needs capital (L3.3.11: Unexpected loss and default correlation).
Expected loss adds up
Risk-based pricing
A loan's interest must pay for four things. Sort each cost first:
Sort itWhich part of the price pays for it?
Interest the bank pays depositors and bondholders on the money it lends on
The average yearly loss from borrowers of this grade defaulting
Relationship managers, credit analysts, systems and monitoring
A bad year with losses far above average
With funding at 4.50%, operating cost 0.40% a year and a pre-tax hurdle rate of 15% on capital, the required rate is . The capital per £, , comes from the one-factor model of the next lesson: the extra loss, above EL, in a 1-in-1,000 year, with an asset correlation of 0.20. For now, take it as given. It is a simplified version of the regulatory IRB formula, which also adds a maturity adjustment and lets the asset correlation fall as PD rises (M4.2: Credit risk capital). By grade, for an unsecured loan with LGD 45%:
| Grade | PD | EL rate | Capital K | Capital charge | Required rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.03% | 0.01% | 0.48% | 0.05% | 4.96% |
| 2 | 0.07% | 0.03% | 0.93% | 0.10% | 5.03% |
| 3 | 0.14% | 0.06% | 1.57% | 0.16% | 5.13% |
| 4 | 0.28% | 0.13% | 2.59% | 0.27% | 5.30% |
| 5 | 0.57% | 0.26% | 4.23% | 0.44% | 5.60% |
| 6 | 1.13% | 0.51% | 6.59% | 0.69% | 6.10% |
| 7 | 2.26% | 1.02% | 9.95% | 1.05% | 6.96% |
| 8 | 4.53% | 2.04% | 14.36% | 1.51% | 8.45% |
| 9 | 11.31% | 5.09% | 20.84% | 2.19% | 12.18% |
The price rises slowly through the strong grades and steeply through the weak ones, because both EL and capital grow with PD. This is risk-based pricing. Suppose instead the bank charged every corporate borrower the same rate, the book's EAD-weighted average required rate of 5.82%. The 7 strong borrowers would be overcharged and could refinance elsewhere; the 5 weak ones, Graybeck at a required 17.03% among them, would be glad to stay. That is adverse selection.
The formal version
Expected loss. Let be 1 if the borrower defaults within the year (probability PD) and 0 otherwise. The loss is . If EAD and LGD are taken as their averages given default:
The LGD and EAD that belong in the formula are those given default. If recoveries are worse and lines fuller in the years when defaults are high, those averages are higher than in a normal year, which is why banks use downturn LGDs and CCFs measured on defaulted facilities.
Price and return on capital. Per £1 of EAD for a year, with capital and the rest funded at , the profit after expected loss and costs must give the hurdle return on :
A loan priced at earns exactly ; any lower rate earns less. (Tax, fees and the loan's term are left out to keep the structure clear.)
Try it
Move the grade from 1 to 9 and watch the capital charge overtake the expected loss. Then propose a rate and see whether it meets the hurdle.
Try itPrice a loan
- Funding4.50%
- Expected loss (PD × LGD)0.51%
- Operating cost0.40%
- Capital charge K × (hurdle − funding)0.69%
- Required loan rate6.10%
Worked example
Pricing Bramwick Stores plc's facility
From expected loss to a price
Step 1 of 5- 1
Expected loss
Regulatory lens · looking ahead
Regulatory capital for credit risk is set for unexpected loss; expected loss is meant to be covered by pricing and provisions. Banks on the IRB approach compare their expected loss with their provisions, and a shortfall reduces capital (M4.2: Credit risk capital). Accounting provisions use expected credit losses too, over twelve months or the loan's lifetime under IFRS 9 (L3.3.18: Provisioning basics, M4.7: Accounting for risk). Risk-adjusted performance measures and capital allocation come back in M6.5: Portfolio credit models.
Spark Atoms
Spark AtomWhy banks do not just charge more
Spark AtomThe loss you almost never have
Key takeaways
- EL = PD × LGD × EAD; the corporate book's is £2.81m on £587m (0.48%), the bank's £22.8m.
- Expected loss is an average over outcomes; a single loan almost never loses exactly its EL.
- Portfolio EL is the sum of the loans' ELs: diversification does not reduce it.
- A risk-based price is funding + EL + costs + capital × (hurdle − funding).
- RAROC tests a proposed rate; one price for all borrowers invites adverse selection.
Reaction
Check what stuck
Question 1 · objective 1
A loan has PD 2%, LGD 40% and EAD £5m. What is its one-year expected loss, in £?
Question 2 · objective 3
Funding costs 4%, operating cost is 0.5%, the EL rate is 0.5%, capital is 6% of EAD and the hurdle rate is 14%. What loan rate is needed, in %?
Question 3 · objective 2
The corporate book's expected loss is £2.81m. In most years, what is the actual credit loss on the book?
Question 4 · objective 4
If the bank charged every corporate borrower the same 5.82%, what would happen over time?
Question 5 · objective 2
Why does the bank's expected loss not shrink when it adds more borrowers, while its unexpected loss per £ does?
Glossary
- Expected loss (EL)
- Expected loss: the average credit loss over a horizon (usually one year), PD × LGD × EAD for one exposure, summed over a portfolio.
- EL rate
- Expected loss divided by EAD: the share of the exposure lost on average each year, PD × LGD.
- Risk-based pricing
- Setting each loan's rate from its own risk: funding, expected loss, costs and a return on the capital it needs.
- Economic capital
- Capital the bank holds against a loan so that losses above the expected level, up to a high quantile, do not make it insolvent.
- Hurdle rate
- The minimum return shareholders require on the capital they put up.
- RAROC
- Risk-adjusted return on capital: income after funding, expected loss and costs, divided by the capital the loan needs.
- Adverse selection
- When one price is charged to borrowers of different risk, the safer ones leave for cheaper lenders and the riskier ones stay.
Deep Dives & Origins
Deep Dives
- A. Saunders, M. M. Cornett and O. Erhemjamts, Financial Institutions Management: A Risk Management Approach, 11th ed., McGraw-Hill, 2023, the chapters on credit risk (individual loan risk, which covers the return on a loan and RAROC, and loan portfolio risk). Intermediate.
- C. Bluhm, L. Overbeck and C. Wagner, Introduction to Credit Risk Modeling, 2nd ed., Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2010, chapter 1 on expected and unexpected loss. Advanced.
Origins
- J. E. Stiglitz and A. Weiss, “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information”, American Economic Review 71(3), 1981.
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, An Explanatory Note on the Basel II IRB Risk Weight Functions, BIS, 2005.
Watch this lesson
Video version
Prefer to watch? The same lesson as a 12-minute video will sit here, made from this page's script.