Core Path · L3.2.18

Valuation control and the daily risk report

12 minMarket riskValuationReporting

Know these first

By the end you will be able to

  1. 1Run independent price verification on a desk's marks and turn the gaps into P&L adjustments.
  2. 2Place positions in the fair value hierarchy and explain why Level 3 needs more control.
  3. 3Explain prudent valuation and estimate illustrative additional valuation adjustments (AVAs).
  4. 4Build and read the desk's daily risk report, and decide what to escalate.

Why it matters

Every number in this module, from the £1.94m VaR to the £9.01m stress loss, starts from the prices at which the desk marks its positions. If those marks are wrong, so is everything built on them, including the P&L the traders are paid on. This lesson checks the marks, makes them prudent, and then puts the whole module onto the one page that the desk, market risk and the CRO read every morning.

Core explanation

From trusted prices to a one-page report

Illustrative dataRiskAtoms Bank plc's Markets desk

The module's trading book: eight positions in four books (Equities, Rates, FX and commodities, Credit) driven by eight risk factors, with 750 days of seeded factor moves that include a stressed spell (days 480 to 539) and four jump days. Every position is revalued in full. The numbers are made up for teaching, in pounds, on one valuation day; they are not market data.

The front-office marks, independent quotes and tolerances below are an illustrative extra. The risk figures in the report are the module's own, from L3.2.08: P&L attribution and explain to L3.2.17: Market liquidity risk.

Independent price verification

Traders mark their positions at the close. They know the market best, but they also benefit from high marks, so the marks are checked by someone who does not: product control, usually part of Finance. This is independent price verification (IPV): compare each mark, or each model input, with exchange prices, dealer quotes, broker screens or a consensus pricing service. A gap within the tolerance is accepted; a larger gap is adjusted in the official P&L and investigated.

PositionInput checkedFront officeIndependentValue gapResult
UK index futures (long £60m)settlement price (Exchange settlement)8,000 points8,000 points£0ok
US equity basket ($39m)closing prices (Exchange closing prices)as quotedas quoted£0ok
UK index puts (1,000 contracts)implied volatility (Consensus pricing service)16.0 vol pts15.4 vol pts−£74,455adjust
10-year gilt (£100m face)yield (Dealer composite)4.400 %4.403 %−£23,888ok
2-year swap, pay fixed (£300m)2-year swap rate (Broker screens)4.000 %4.001 %+£5,658ok
Sell $26m forwardGBP/USD (4pm fixing)1.3000 $ per £1.3002 $ per £+£3,077ok
Brent futures (200,000 barrels)settlement price (Exchange settlement)80.00 $/bbl80.00 $/bbl£0ok
Corporate bonds (£80m)credit spread (Three dealer quotes: 122, 126, 131)120 bp126 bp−£205,820adjust

Two positions fail. The puts are marked at 16.0 vol points against a consensus of 15.4: with a vega of £124k per point they are overvalued by £74,455. The corporate bonds are marked at a 120bp spread; three dealers quote 122, 126, 131bp, so the independent level is 126bp and the bonds are overvalued by £205,820. Product control books an adjustment of −£280,274 and asks the desk why its marks drifted. The gilt, swap and FX gaps are inside tolerance and left alone.

How observable is the price?

Accounting sorts fair values by the inputs behind them: the fair value hierarchy of IFRS 13. The less observable the input, the harder the IPV and the more disclosure and caution are needed.

Sort itLevel 1, 2 or 3?

Sort each valuation by the inputs it rests on.

  • UK index futures, valued at the exchange's settlement price

  • A 2-year sterling swap, valued from a curve built from quoted swap rates

  • An FX forward valued from spot and the two currencies' interest rates

  • A bespoke basket option whose value depends on a correlation no market quotes

  • Shares in the US equity basket, valued at their closing prices on the exchange

Prudent valuation

Fair value is an exit price in an orderly sale. Bank regulators want more caution for capital: under the EU's prudent valuation standard, which the UK carried into its own rules after Brexit, a bank values each position at a level it is 90% confident it could exit at or better. The difference between fair value and this prudent value is a set of additional valuation adjustments (AVAs), deducted from common equity tier 1 capital. The standard lists nine: market price uncertainty, close-out costs, model risk, unearned credit spreads, investing and funding costs, concentrated positions, future administrative costs, early termination and operational risk. For the desk, four matter:

AVASource on this deskAmount
Market price uncertaintyCorporate bond quotes 122, 126, 131bp: 90% level 132.1bp£209,667
Close-out costsHalf the bid-ask spread on every position (L3.2.17)£274,765
Concentrated positionsPrice impact of exiting bonds worth ten days' volume (L3.2.17)£400,000
Model riskPuts: ±0.3 vol points across plausible smile models£37,227
Total£921,660

Smaller banks (fair-valued assets and liabilities below €15 billion) may instead use a simplified approach: 0.1% of the absolute fair values. On the desk's £210m of positions that would be only £209,746, under a quarter of the estimate above, because the concentrated bond holding drives most of the uncertainty. The real calculation has more detail, including how individual AVAs are aggregated; it belongs to M4.7: Accounting for risk.

The daily risk report

L2.4.07: Risk reporting set out what makes a good risk report. For a trading desk it is the daily risk pack: one page, the same layout every day, ready before the market opens. Here is the desk's, built entirely from this module's figures:

Markets desk: daily risk report

Illustrative data close of day 749

1. P&L

Hypothetical (yesterday's positions)+£0.355m
Actual (with trading and new deals)+£0.565m
Last 21 days, hypothetical−£0.24m
UK equity index +0.61%
+£249,239
US equity index +0.49%
+£147,240
GBP 2-year swap rate −3.51bp
−£123,353
GBP 10-year swap rate −3.51bp
+£324,637
GBP/USD (dollars per pound) −0.16%
+£16,220
Brent crude −1.56%
−£192,098
UK index implied volatility −0.79 pts
−£98,032
Investment-grade credit spread −0.46bp
+£15,779

Unexplained by sensitivities: +£14,884 (L3.2.08).

2. Risk measures (99%, 1 day unless stated)

VaR, delta-normal (limit model)£1.94m
VaR, historical, 750 days£2.27m
VaR, historical, last 250 days£2.86m
VaR, Monte Carlo, 10,000 paths£1.85m
ES 97.5%, historical£2.39m
Stressed VaR (days 266–515)£2.93m
10-day VaR (√10)£6.15m
Liquidity-adjusted VaR£2.63m

3. Backtesting (last 250 days)

Exceptions, delta-normal5 amber
Exception days505, 513, 515, 520, 524

4. Stress tests

Worst scenario: gilt sell-off−£9.01m of £12m
Reverse stress (£10m), calm distance12.0σ

5. Valuation control

IPV breachesputs, corporate bonds
IPV adjustment to P&L−£280,274
Prudent valuation AVAs (illustrative)£921,660

6. Limits: 12 green, 2 amber, 0 breaches

Full table below. Amber: 10-year bucket DV01; Largest single issuer.

LimitNowUtilisationStatus
Desk VaR (99%, 1 day)£1.94m
78%
green
Equities book VaR£1.45m
76%
green
Rates book VaR£0.88m
76%
green
FX and commodities book VaR£0.64m
75%
green
Credit book VaR£0.49m
76%
green
Equity delta (UK + US)£707.3k per %
79%
green
Net DV01 (all rates)£57.3k per bp
76%
green
10-year bucket DV01£92.5k per bp
92%
amber
Vega£124.1k per pt
71%
green
FX delta (GBP/USD)£100.0k per %
67%
green
Commodity delta (Brent)£123.1k per %
70%
green
CS01£34.3k per bp
76%
green
Worst stress loss£9.01m
75%
green
Largest single issuer£20.00m
100%
amber

Sort itTriage the report

For each line, decide: fine as it is, watch it, or escalate today.

  • Corporate bond IPV: 6bp outside a 3bp tolerance, −£205,820

  • Backtesting: 5 exceptions in 250 days (amber), all in the stressed spell

  • 10-year bucket DV01 at 92% of its limit

  • Liquidity-adjusted VaR £2.63m, 35% above VaR

  • Hypothetical P&L +£354,516, almost all explained by sensitivities

The formal version

The value of an IPV gap. For a position whose value depends on an input xx with sensitivity ∂V/∂x\partial V/\partial x, marked at xFOx_{\text{FO}} and verified at xIPVx_{\text{IPV}}:

ΔV≈∂V∂x (xIPV−xFO),adjust if ∣xIPV−xFO∣>toleranceΔVbonds=−£34,303 per bp×(126−120) bp=−£205,820\begin{aligned} \Delta V &\approx \frac{\partial V}{\partial x}\,(x_{\text{IPV}} - x_{\text{FO}}), \qquad \text{adjust if } |x_{\text{IPV}} - x_{\text{FO}}| > \text{tolerance} \\ \Delta V_{\text{bonds}} &= -\text{£}34{,}303\ \text{per bp} \times (126 - 120)\,\text{bp} = -\text{£}205{,}820 \end{aligned}

Market price uncertainty at 90%. With nn independent quotes of mean sˉ\bar s and sample standard deviation sqs_q, one simple estimate of the prudent spread, assuming normal quote errors, is

s90=sˉ+z0.90 sq=126.33+1.2816×4.51=132.11 bpAVAMPU=∣CS01∣×(s90−sFV)=£34,303×(132.11−126)=£209,667\begin{aligned} s_{90} &= \bar s + z_{0.90}\,s_q = 126.33 + 1.2816 \times 4.51 = 132.11\ \text{bp} \\ \mathrm{AVA}_{\text{MPU}} &= |\mathrm{CS01}| \times (s_{90} - s_{\text{FV}}) = \text{£}34{,}303 \times (132.11 - 126) = \text{£}209{,}667 \end{aligned}

Banks use richer methods (the range of quotes, consensus data, expert judgement), but the logic is the same: find the price at the 90% point of the plausible range and measure how far it sits from fair value.

Try it

Move the independent level until the corporate bonds pass, then tighten the tolerance until the gilt fails. Notice how small input gaps turn into large sums for positions with big sensitivities.

Try itVerify the front office's marks

Position

Front-office mark: 120.0 bp (credit spread). Independent source: Three dealer quotes: 122, 126, 131.

Difference+6.0 bp
Value at the independent level minus the mark−£205,820
Resultoutside tolerance
IPV adjustment to P&L−£205,820

Worked example

Morning of day 750: from marks to the report

Product control and market risk, before the market opens

Step 1 of 5
  1. 1

    Verify the marks

    Eight positions checked; two outside tolerance. Puts: −0.6 vol points × £124.1k = −£74,455. Corporate bonds: +6bp × −£34,303 = −£205,820.

Why one page

The report's value is that it never changes shape. A CRO who reads the same page every morning notices when something moves; a new layout every day hides the signal.

Regulatory lens

The EU Capital Requirements Regulation (Article 105) requires banks to value trading positions prudently, with independent price verification, and the European Banking Authority's technical standard on prudent valuation (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/101) sets out the nine AVAs, the 90% confidence level and the simplified approach below €15 billion. In the UK the PRA moved both into its Rulebook (the Trading Book (CRR) Part) from 1 January 2022, keeping the simplified and core approaches. Fair value and its hierarchy come from IFRS 13. Both are covered in M4.7: Accounting for risk. The Basel Committee's principles for risk data aggregation and risk reporting (BCBS 239, January 2013) set the standard for reports like the daily pack; they are in M4.9: Supervision, stress testing and disclosure.

Spark Atoms

Spark AtomMarks at the edge of the spread
In early 2012 the traders running JPMorgan Chase's “London Whale” book stopped marking their positions at mid prices and began picking prices at the edge of the bid-ask spread that made the losses look smaller. The US Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations described the practice in its March 2013 hearing. Independent price verification exists to catch exactly that.
Spark AtomHidden in plain sight
In January 2008 Société Générale announced a loss of about €4.9 billion from unwinding unauthorised positions built up by one trader, Jérôme Kerviel, who had hidden them behind fictitious offsetting trades. Valuation control and reconciliation of trades to independent records are the defences.

Key takeaways

  • Independent price verification checks the desk's marks against sources the traders do not control; gaps beyond tolerance are adjusted.
  • An input gap times the position's sensitivity gives the value gap: 6bp × £34,303 per bp is £205,820 on the corporate bonds.
  • IFRS 13's hierarchy sorts fair values by how observable their inputs are; Level 3 needs the most control.
  • Prudent value is the 90%-confidence exit level; the gap to fair value is a set of AVAs deducted from CET1.
  • The daily risk pack brings P&L, VaR, ES, limits, backtesting, stress and valuation onto one page that never changes shape.

Reaction

Check what stuck

Question 1 · objective 1

The corporate bonds have a CS01 of −£34,303 per bp. The front office marks the spread at 120bp; independent quotes put it at 126bp. By how much is the position overvalued, in £ (nearest pound)?

£

Question 2 · objective 1

Who should run independent price verification for the trading desk?

Question 3 · objective 2

A bespoke option's price depends on a correlation that no market quotes. Where does it sit in the fair value hierarchy?

Question 4 · objective 3

Three dealer quotes for the bonds' spread: 122, 126 and 131bp (mean 126.33, sample sd 4.51). Using a normal distribution, what spread is the bank 90% confident it could sell at or better, in bp (one decimal)?

bp

Question 5 · objective 4

Which item in today's risk report most needs a decision from someone above the desk?

Glossary

Mark
The price at which the front office values a position at the end of the day.
Independent price verification (IPV)
Independent price verification: checking the front office's marks, or the inputs to its models, against sources the traders do not control.
Product control
The team, usually in Finance, that owns the official P&L and runs independent price verification.
Tolerance
The largest gap between the front office's mark and the independent level that is accepted without adjustment.
Fair value hierarchy
IFRS 13's three levels for fair value inputs: Level 1 quoted prices for identical assets in active markets, Level 2 other observable inputs, Level 3 unobservable inputs.
Prudent value
A value at which the bank is 90% confident it could exit the position, under the EU's prudent valuation standard. It is at or below fair value for assets.
Additional valuation adjustment (AVA)
Additional valuation adjustment: the gap between fair value and prudent value for one source of valuation uncertainty, deducted from CET1 capital.
Daily risk pack
The report the desk, market risk and senior management read every morning: P&L, risk measures, limits, backtesting, stress tests and valuation.

Deep Dives & Origins

Deep Dives

  • European Banking Authority, Final draft RTS on prudent valuation under Article 105(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, EBA/RTS/2014/06/rev1, 23 January 2015. Advanced.
  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting (BCBS 239), January 2013. Intermediate.

Origins

  • Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/101 of 26 October 2015, regulatory technical standards for prudent valuation under Article 105(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
  • Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (Capital Requirements Regulation), Article 105.
  • IFRS Foundation, IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement, 2011.
  • US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, JPMorgan Chase Whale Trades: A Case History of Derivatives Risks and Abuses, March 2013 (via the Demos summary).

Watch this lesson

Video version

Prefer to watch? The same lesson as a 12-minute video will sit here, made from this page's script.