Know these first
- L2.4.07: Risk reporting
By the end you will be able to
- 1Run independent price verification on a desk's marks and turn the gaps into P&L adjustments.
- 2Place positions in the fair value hierarchy and explain why Level 3 needs more control.
- 3Explain prudent valuation and estimate illustrative additional valuation adjustments (AVAs).
- 4Build and read the desk's daily risk report, and decide what to escalate.
Why it matters
Every number in this module, from the £1.94m VaR to the £9.01m stress loss, starts from the prices at which the desk marks its positions. If those marks are wrong, so is everything built on them, including the P&L the traders are paid on. This lesson checks the marks, makes them prudent, and then puts the whole module onto the one page that the desk, market risk and the CRO read every morning.
Core explanation
From trusted prices to a one-page report
Illustrative dataRiskAtoms Bank plc's Markets desk
The module's trading book: eight positions in four books (Equities, Rates, FX and commodities, Credit) driven by eight risk factors, with 750 days of seeded factor moves that include a stressed spell (days 480 to 539) and four jump days. Every position is revalued in full. The numbers are made up for teaching, in pounds, on one valuation day; they are not market data.
Independent price verification
Traders mark their positions at the close. They know the market best, but they also benefit from high marks, so the marks are checked by someone who does not: product control, usually part of Finance. This is independent price verification (IPV): compare each mark, or each model input, with exchange prices, dealer quotes, broker screens or a consensus pricing service. A gap within the tolerance is accepted; a larger gap is adjusted in the official P&L and investigated.
| Position | Input checked | Front office | Independent | Value gap | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK index futures (long £60m) | settlement price (Exchange settlement) | 8,000 points | 8,000 points | £0 | ok |
| US equity basket ($39m) | closing prices (Exchange closing prices) | as quoted | as quoted | £0 | ok |
| UK index puts (1,000 contracts) | implied volatility (Consensus pricing service) | 16.0 vol pts | 15.4 vol pts | −£74,455 | adjust |
| 10-year gilt (£100m face) | yield (Dealer composite) | 4.400 % | 4.403 % | −£23,888 | ok |
| 2-year swap, pay fixed (£300m) | 2-year swap rate (Broker screens) | 4.000 % | 4.001 % | +£5,658 | ok |
| Sell $26m forward | GBP/USD (4pm fixing) | 1.3000 $ per £ | 1.3002 $ per £ | +£3,077 | ok |
| Brent futures (200,000 barrels) | settlement price (Exchange settlement) | 80.00 $/bbl | 80.00 $/bbl | £0 | ok |
| Corporate bonds (£80m) | credit spread (Three dealer quotes: 122, 126, 131) | 120 bp | 126 bp | −£205,820 | adjust |
Two positions fail. The puts are marked at 16.0 vol points against a consensus of 15.4: with a vega of £124k per point they are overvalued by £74,455. The corporate bonds are marked at a 120bp spread; three dealers quote 122, 126, 131bp, so the independent level is 126bp and the bonds are overvalued by £205,820. Product control books an adjustment of −£280,274 and asks the desk why its marks drifted. The gilt, swap and FX gaps are inside tolerance and left alone.
How observable is the price?
Accounting sorts fair values by the inputs behind them: the fair value hierarchy of IFRS 13. The less observable the input, the harder the IPV and the more disclosure and caution are needed.
Sort itLevel 1, 2 or 3?
Sort each valuation by the inputs it rests on.
UK index futures, valued at the exchange's settlement price
A 2-year sterling swap, valued from a curve built from quoted swap rates
An FX forward valued from spot and the two currencies' interest rates
A bespoke basket option whose value depends on a correlation no market quotes
Shares in the US equity basket, valued at their closing prices on the exchange
Prudent valuation
Fair value is an exit price in an orderly sale. Bank regulators want more caution for capital: under the EU's prudent valuation standard, which the UK carried into its own rules after Brexit, a bank values each position at a level it is 90% confident it could exit at or better. The difference between fair value and this prudent value is a set of additional valuation adjustments (AVAs), deducted from common equity tier 1 capital. The standard lists nine: market price uncertainty, close-out costs, model risk, unearned credit spreads, investing and funding costs, concentrated positions, future administrative costs, early termination and operational risk. For the desk, four matter:
| AVA | Source on this desk | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Market price uncertainty | Corporate bond quotes 122, 126, 131bp: 90% level 132.1bp | £209,667 |
| Close-out costs | Half the bid-ask spread on every position (L3.2.17) | £274,765 |
| Concentrated positions | Price impact of exiting bonds worth ten days' volume (L3.2.17) | £400,000 |
| Model risk | Puts: ±0.3 vol points across plausible smile models | £37,227 |
| Total | £921,660 |
Smaller banks (fair-valued assets and liabilities below €15 billion) may instead use a simplified approach: 0.1% of the absolute fair values. On the desk's £210m of positions that would be only £209,746, under a quarter of the estimate above, because the concentrated bond holding drives most of the uncertainty. The real calculation has more detail, including how individual AVAs are aggregated; it belongs to M4.7: Accounting for risk.
The daily risk report
L2.4.07: Risk reporting set out what makes a good risk report. For a trading desk it is the daily risk pack: one page, the same layout every day, ready before the market opens. Here is the desk's, built entirely from this module's figures:
Markets desk: daily risk report
Illustrative data close of day 7491. P&L
Unexplained by sensitivities: +£14,884 (L3.2.08).
2. Risk measures (99%, 1 day unless stated)
3. Backtesting (last 250 days)
4. Stress tests
5. Valuation control
6. Limits: 12 green, 2 amber, 0 breaches
Full table below. Amber: 10-year bucket DV01; Largest single issuer.
| Limit | Now | Limit | Utilisation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desk VaR (99%, 1 day) | £1.94m | £2.50m | 78% | green |
| Equities book VaR | £1.45m | £1.90m | 76% | green |
| Rates book VaR | £0.88m | £1.15m | 76% | green |
| FX and commodities book VaR | £0.64m | £0.85m | 75% | green |
| Credit book VaR | £0.49m | £0.65m | 76% | green |
| Equity delta (UK + US) | £707.3k per % | £900.0k per % | 79% | green |
| Net DV01 (all rates) | £57.3k per bp | £75.0k per bp | 76% | green |
| 10-year bucket DV01 | £92.5k per bp | £100.0k per bp | 92% | amber |
| Vega | £124.1k per pt | £175.0k per pt | 71% | green |
| FX delta (GBP/USD) | £100.0k per % | £150.0k per % | 67% | green |
| Commodity delta (Brent) | £123.1k per % | £175.0k per % | 70% | green |
| CS01 | £34.3k per bp | £45.0k per bp | 76% | green |
| Worst stress loss | £9.01m | £12.00m | 75% | green |
| Largest single issuer | £20.00m | £20.00m | 100% | amber |
Sort itTriage the report
For each line, decide: fine as it is, watch it, or escalate today.
Corporate bond IPV: 6bp outside a 3bp tolerance, −£205,820
Backtesting: 5 exceptions in 250 days (amber), all in the stressed spell
10-year bucket DV01 at 92% of its limit
Liquidity-adjusted VaR £2.63m, 35% above VaR
Hypothetical P&L +£354,516, almost all explained by sensitivities
The formal version
The value of an IPV gap. For a position whose value depends on an input with sensitivity , marked at and verified at :
Market price uncertainty at 90%. With independent quotes of mean and sample standard deviation , one simple estimate of the prudent spread, assuming normal quote errors, is
Banks use richer methods (the range of quotes, consensus data, expert judgement), but the logic is the same: find the price at the 90% point of the plausible range and measure how far it sits from fair value.
Try it
Move the independent level until the corporate bonds pass, then tighten the tolerance until the gilt fails. Notice how small input gaps turn into large sums for positions with big sensitivities.
Try itVerify the front office's marks
Position
Front-office mark: 120.0 bp (credit spread). Independent source: Three dealer quotes: 122, 126, 131.
Worked example
Morning of day 750: from marks to the report
Product control and market risk, before the market opens
Step 1 of 5- 1
Verify the marks
Eight positions checked; two outside tolerance. Puts: −0.6 vol points × £124.1k = −£74,455. Corporate bonds: +6bp × −£34,303 = −£205,820.
Why one page
Regulatory lens
The EU Capital Requirements Regulation (Article 105) requires banks to value trading positions prudently, with independent price verification, and the European Banking Authority's technical standard on prudent valuation (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/101) sets out the nine AVAs, the 90% confidence level and the simplified approach below €15 billion. In the UK the PRA moved both into its Rulebook (the Trading Book (CRR) Part) from 1 January 2022, keeping the simplified and core approaches. Fair value and its hierarchy come from IFRS 13. Both are covered in M4.7: Accounting for risk. The Basel Committee's principles for risk data aggregation and risk reporting (BCBS 239, January 2013) set the standard for reports like the daily pack; they are in M4.9: Supervision, stress testing and disclosure.
Spark Atoms
Spark AtomMarks at the edge of the spread
Spark AtomHidden in plain sight
Key takeaways
- Independent price verification checks the desk's marks against sources the traders do not control; gaps beyond tolerance are adjusted.
- An input gap times the position's sensitivity gives the value gap: 6bp × £34,303 per bp is £205,820 on the corporate bonds.
- IFRS 13's hierarchy sorts fair values by how observable their inputs are; Level 3 needs the most control.
- Prudent value is the 90%-confidence exit level; the gap to fair value is a set of AVAs deducted from CET1.
- The daily risk pack brings P&L, VaR, ES, limits, backtesting, stress and valuation onto one page that never changes shape.
Reaction
Check what stuck
Question 1 · objective 1
The corporate bonds have a CS01 of −£34,303 per bp. The front office marks the spread at 120bp; independent quotes put it at 126bp. By how much is the position overvalued, in £ (nearest pound)?
Question 2 · objective 1
Who should run independent price verification for the trading desk?
Question 3 · objective 2
A bespoke option's price depends on a correlation that no market quotes. Where does it sit in the fair value hierarchy?
Question 4 · objective 3
Three dealer quotes for the bonds' spread: 122, 126 and 131bp (mean 126.33, sample sd 4.51). Using a normal distribution, what spread is the bank 90% confident it could sell at or better, in bp (one decimal)?
Question 5 · objective 4
Which item in today's risk report most needs a decision from someone above the desk?
Glossary
- Mark
- The price at which the front office values a position at the end of the day.
- Independent price verification (IPV)
- Independent price verification: checking the front office's marks, or the inputs to its models, against sources the traders do not control.
- Product control
- The team, usually in Finance, that owns the official P&L and runs independent price verification.
- Tolerance
- The largest gap between the front office's mark and the independent level that is accepted without adjustment.
- Fair value hierarchy
- IFRS 13's three levels for fair value inputs: Level 1 quoted prices for identical assets in active markets, Level 2 other observable inputs, Level 3 unobservable inputs.
- Prudent value
- A value at which the bank is 90% confident it could exit the position, under the EU's prudent valuation standard. It is at or below fair value for assets.
- Additional valuation adjustment (AVA)
- Additional valuation adjustment: the gap between fair value and prudent value for one source of valuation uncertainty, deducted from CET1 capital.
- Daily risk pack
- The report the desk, market risk and senior management read every morning: P&L, risk measures, limits, backtesting, stress tests and valuation.
Deep Dives & Origins
Deep Dives
- European Banking Authority, Final draft RTS on prudent valuation under Article 105(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, EBA/RTS/2014/06/rev1, 23 January 2015. Advanced.
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting (BCBS 239), January 2013. Intermediate.
Origins
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/101 of 26 October 2015, regulatory technical standards for prudent valuation under Article 105(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
- Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (Capital Requirements Regulation), Article 105.
- IFRS Foundation, IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement, 2011.
- US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, JPMorgan Chase Whale Trades: A Case History of Derivatives Risks and Abuses, March 2013 (via the Demos summary).
Module complete
Watch this lesson
Video version
Prefer to watch? The same lesson as a 12-minute video will sit here, made from this page's script.