Know these first
- L2.3.05: Risk appetite frameworks
Math Atoms
By the end you will be able to
- 1Choose key risk indicators (KRIs) with amber and red thresholds that give early warning.
- 2Tell a leading indicator from a lagging one, and a KRI from a KPI and a KCI.
- 3Set thresholds that balance early warning against false alarms, and link them to risk appetite.
- 4Calculate a KRI as a percentage and describe its change in percentage points.
Why it matters
In October 2026 a failed software change took Larkfield's card and app payments down for five hours. Looking back, the warning signs had been in its own data for most of a year. Nobody was measuring the right thing.
Core explanation
Numbers that warn you before the loss
Monitoring is the step that keeps the cycle turning (L2.4.01: The risk management cycle). Its main tool is the key risk indicator (KRI): a number, measured every week or month, that tells a risk owner whether a risk on the register (L2.4.04: Risk registers) is growing. Each one gets thresholds: green is normal, amber is early warning, red means act now and escalate.
Three kinds of indicator. They are easy to confuse:
| Indicator | Answers | Larkfield example |
|---|---|---|
| KRI | Is the risk getting bigger? | Failed changes to the payments platform (%) |
| KCI | Is a control working? | Daily reconciliations completed on time (%) |
| KPI | Is the business hitting its goals? | Payments processed per day |
Lead, not lag. A leading indicator measures a cause, so it moves before the loss: staff turnover, failed changes, overdue security patches. Lagging indicators count the damage: losses, downtime, complaints. They matter for learning, but by the time they move it is too late to warn. Most firms need both; the skill is finding a leading one for each top risk.
Sort itLeading or lagging?
Each is a candidate KRI for one of Larkfield's risks.
Staff turnover in payments operations (R7)
Number of payments sent to the wrong account last month (R7)
Critical security patches overdue (R3)
Complaints upheld about the payment protection add-on (R5)
Unsecured loans 30+ days in arrears (R4)
What makes a good KRI. It is linked to a named risk on the register and to the firm's risk appetite (L2.3.05: Risk appetite frameworks). It leads. It comes from reliable data that is cheap to collect. It is a rate where the volume changes (failures per 100 changes, not failures), so growth in the business does not look like growth in risk. And there are few of them: a board cannot watch 200. Larkfield has one per register risk:
| Risk | KRI |
|---|---|
| R1 Payments platform outage | Failed or rolled-back changes to the payments platform (%) |
| R2 Card and app fraud | Fraud losses per €1m of card and app payments |
| R3 Cyber attack and data breach | Critical security patches overdue |
| R4 Consumer loan losses above plan | Unsecured loans 30+ days in arrears (%) |
| R5 Mis-selling of payment protection | Complaints per 1,000 add-on sales |
| R6 Cloud provider failure | Provider service-level breaches a month |
| R7 Manual payment errors | Payments repaired by hand (%) |
| R8 Regulatory reporting error | Supervisory returns resubmitted |
Setting thresholds
The formal version
Most KRIs are percentages (M-A01: Percentages). For Larkfield's payments platform in month :
With an amber threshold and a red threshold (), the status each month is:
To compare two months, give the change in percentage points (the plain difference), and say so if you give the relative change instead:
Shown in full: these are percentages and comparisons you already know.
Try it
Here are 24 months of Larkfield's data before the outage. The thresholds start too loose. Tune them so that amber comes at least six months and red at least three months before the outage, with no false alarms in the quiet first year. Then switch to the lagging indicator and try again.
Try itTune a KRI to catch the outage early
Indicator
Failed or rolled-back changes to the payments platform (% of changes), November 2024 to October 2026. Illustrative data. The shaded first year had no build-up, so any alert there is a false alarm.
Too late: aim for amber at least 6 months and red at least 3 months before the outage, with no false alarms.
Worked example
Reading the failed-change KRI
After the outage, the COO asks what the KRI would have shown with the thresholds the risk owner has now set: amber at 5%, red at 8%. Work out each step first.
Month by month
Step 1 of 5- 1
Why these thresholds
In the quiet first year the KRI never went above 4.4%, so amber at 5% sits just above normal. Red at 8% matches the level at which the owner judges an outage likely enough to breach Larkfield's appetite for disruption.
Regulatory lens
The Basel Committee's Principles for the Sound Management of Operational Risk (revised 2021) list key risk and performance indicators among the monitoring tools banks should use, with thresholds or limits tied to risk appetite and clear escalation when they are breached. The Financial Stability Board's Principles for an Effective Risk Appetite Framework (2013) expect appetite to be turned into measurable limits that are monitored.
UK operational resilience rules, in force since March 2022, add a twist: firms must set impact tolerances for how long each important business service can be disrupted, which make natural red thresholds. More in Level 3: Core Risk Disciplines.
Sparks
Spark300 near misses, 29 minor injuries, 1 major
SparkWhen a measure becomes a target
Key takeaways
- A KRI is a regular number that shows whether a register risk is growing; a KCI tracks a control, a KPI tracks performance.
- Leading indicators measure causes and warn in time; lagging ones count losses after the event.
- Amber is early warning for the owner; red triggers escalation and is usually tied to risk appetite.
- Thresholds trade early warning against false alarms: start amber just above the normal range.
- Use rates rather than counts, and give changes in percentage points unless you say otherwise.
Reaction
Check what stuck
Question 1 · objective 4
In a month, 9 of 75 changes to a system failed or were rolled back. What is the KRI, as a percentage?
Question 2 · objective 4
The month before, it was 4 failures in 80 changes (5%). By how many percentage points did the KRI rise?
Question 3 · objective 2
Which is a leading indicator for the risk of a payments outage?
Question 4 · objective 3
A KRI moves from green to amber. What should happen?
Question 5 · objective 3
On Larkfield's data, with amber at 5% and red at 8%, how many months before the outage did the KRI first turn red?
Glossary
- KRI
- Key risk indicator: a number, measured regularly, that shows whether a risk is growing or shrinking.
- KCI
- Key control indicator: a number that shows whether a control is working, such as the share of checks done on time.
- KPI
- Key performance indicator: a number that shows how well the business is doing against its goals.
- Leading indicator
- An indicator that moves before the loss happens, so there is time to act.
- Lagging indicator
- An indicator that moves after the loss has happened. Useful for learning, too late for warning.
- Threshold
- A level of an indicator that triggers a response: amber for early warning, red for escalation.
- Percentage points
- Percentage points: the plain difference between two percentages. From 5% to 12% is 7 percentage points.
Deep Dives & Origins
Deep Dives
- Chapelle, A., Operational Risk Management: Best Practices in the Financial Services Industry, Wiley, 2019, chapter on risk indicators. Intermediate.
- Institute of Operational Risk, Key Risk Indicators, sound practice guidance paper. Intermediate.
Origins
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Revisions to the Principles for the Sound Management of Operational Risk, BIS, March 2021.
- Financial Stability Board, Principles for an Effective Risk Appetite Framework, November 2013.
- Heinrich, H. W., Industrial Accident Prevention: A Scientific Approach, McGraw-Hill, 1931.
- Goodhart, C. A. E., “Problems of Monetary Management: The U.K. Experience”, 1975; Strathern, M., “‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system”, European Review, 1997.
Watch this lesson
Video version
Prefer to watch? The same lesson as a 10-minute video will sit here, made from this page's script.