Core Path · L1.2.07

Central counterparties and market utilities

10 minMarket infrastructureCounterparty risk

By the end you will be able to

  1. 1Explain how a CCP takes on counterparty risk through novation, and mutualises losses through its default fund.
  2. 2Show how multilateral netting shrinks the amounts firms owe each other.
  3. 3Run a default waterfall and say who pays at each layer.
  4. 4Name the other market utilities, such as securities depositories and payment systems, and why they are regulated.

Why it matters

When Lehman Brothers failed in September 2008, it left behind a huge book of interest rate swaps at the clearing house LCH. LCH closed it out within weeks, inside the margin Lehman had posted. Other members lost nothing. A year later, G20 leaders decided that standard derivatives should be cleared this way.

Core explanation

One counterparty for everyone

Every trade that is not settled at once leaves two firms exposed to each other. If one fails before it has paid, the other suffers a loss. This is counterparty risk. In a market where hundreds of firms trade with each other, it forms a tangled web: one failure can pass losses from firm to firm.

A central counterparty (CCP) cuts the web. When two firms agree a trade and send it for clearing, the CCP steps between them by novation: the trade is replaced by two, one between the seller and the CCP, one between the CCP and the buyer. The CCP is now the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer. It holds no market risk itself, because its two trades cancel out; it holds only the risk that one side fails.

Think of a busy group of friends who keep lending each other money. Instead of tracking dozens of IOUs, they agree that one trusted person will stand behind every loan and keep a single running balance for each of them. That person is the CCP.

Netting. Because every firm now faces the same counterparty, what it owes and what it is owed can be offset into one net figure. This multilateral netting shrinks both the payments and the exposures. In the diagram below, four dealers owe each other $360m across 6 links. Through a CCP they settle $110m across 4: 69% less.

ExploreNetting through a CCP

Arrows show who must pay whom, in US$ millions.

1008060403050ABCD

Settle

Payment links6
Total to be paid$360m

Margin: making the losers pay as they go. The CCP only deals with clearing members, and demands collateral from them:

  • Variation margin: every day, the side whose position lost value pays the side that gained. Losses cannot pile up.
  • Initial margin: collateral posted up front, sized to cover what the CCP could lose in the few days it would take to close out a defaulter's positions, in all but extreme markets.
  • Default fund contributions: every member pays into a shared pool that covers losses beyond a defaulter's own margin. This is where risk is mutualised: the survivors share what is left of a failure.

The order in which these resources are used is the default waterfall: defaulter first, then a slice of the CCP's own capital (its skin in the game), then the survivors' default fund, then extra calls on the survivors. You will run it in the Try it below.

The catch. A CCP concentrates risk in one place. If a CCP itself failed, every member would be hit at once. That is why CCPs are among the most tightly supervised firms in finance.

Other market utilities. CCPs are one kind of financial market infrastructure (FMI). Click each one to see what it does.

ExploreThe plumbing of the financial system

Click a box to see what it does and who runs one.

CCPs

Clear trades and guarantee them. Examples: LCH (London), CME Clearing (Chicago), Eurex Clearing (Frankfurt), DTCC's clearing agencies for US securities, and the Japan Securities Clearing Corporation.

The formal version

Netting and the waterfall need only addition, written precisely. For each firm ii, its net position against the CCP is what it is owed minus what it owes:

neti=∑(amounts owed to i)−∑(amounts i owes)\text{net}_i = \sum (\text{amounts owed to } i) - \sum (\text{amounts } i \text{ owes})

The nets always add up to zero, because every payment has a payer and a receiver. The waterfall then takes the loss XX through layers of size R1,R2,…R_1, R_2, \ldots in order. Each layer pays the smaller of its size and what is left:

usedk=min⁡ ⁣(Rk,  X−∑j<kusedj)\text{used}_k = \min\!\Big(R_k,\; X - \sum_{j<k} \text{used}_j\Big)

These build on the sums of L1.2.01, so they are shown here in full rather than animated.

Try it

A member has defaulted. Start with a €400m close-out loss: the defaulter's own resources and the CCP's slice cover most of it, and the survivors pay a little. Then push the loss up until the survivors' fund is used up. Finally, cut the initial margin and see how much sooner the other members are hit.

Try itRun the default waterfall

€400m
€300m
€25m
€450m
Paid by the defaulter€350m
Paid by the CCP€25m
Paid by other members€25m
Left uncovered€0m

The waterfall, in order. The filled part of each layer is used up.

  1. 1. Defaulter's initial margin€300m / €300m
  2. 2. Defaulter's default fund contribution€50m / €50m
  3. 3. CCP's own capital (skin in the game)€25m / €25m
  4. 4. Survivors' default fund contributions€25m / €450m
  5. 5. Assessments on survivors€0m / €450m

The defaulter's default fund contribution is fixed at €50m. Assessments are capped here at one more default fund's worth, a common design.

Worked example

Northbridge Securities defaults

Northbridge Securities, a made-up clearing member of a euro interest rate swap CCP, fails to pay its variation margin one morning. It has posted €300m of initial margin and €50m to the default fund. The CCP holds €25m of skin in the game. 9 other members have each paid €50m into the default fund. Amounts in € millions.

From default to recovery

Step 1 of 5
  1. 1

    Declare the default

    The CCP declares Northbridge in default and takes control of its positions. Every other member keeps trading as normal: their trades are with the CCP, not with Northbridge.

Regulatory lens

  • Global: the CPMI-IOSCO Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMI, 2012) set the standard for CCPs, depositories and payment systems. Among them: initial margin must cover potential losses with at least 99% confidence, and the default fund must cover the default of the largest member (the two largest for systemically important CCPs in complex markets). In 2009 the G20 committed to central clearing of standardised OTC derivatives.
  • United States: the CFTC supervises derivatives CCPs and the SEC securities CCPs; the most important are designated as systemically important under the Dodd-Frank Act. The SEC has also adopted rules to bring more US Treasury trading into central clearing.
  • European Union: EMIR (2012) sets clearing obligations and CCP rules; a 2021 regulation adds recovery and resolution plans for CCPs. ESMA supervises the largest non-EU CCPs serving EU firms.
  • United Kingdom and Asia-Pacific: the Bank of England supervises UK CCPs. In Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore and Australia, securities regulators and central banks oversee them together.
  • Banks: Basel rules give lower capital charges for trades cleared through a CCP that meets the PFMI, a strong reason for banks to clear.

Margin, collateral and clearing for derivatives return in L1.7.11, and counterparty credit risk in later levels.

Sparks

SparkOne trader, two-thirds of a default fund
In September 2018 a single Norwegian trader's bet on Nordic and German power prices went badly wrong. His losses at Nasdaq Clearing ran through his margin and used up roughly two-thirds of the default fund, so other members had to pay. Mutualisation means other people's mistakes can cost you.
SparkWhen a clearing house needed rescuing
After the October 1987 crash, the Hong Kong stock exchange shut for four days, and the guarantee fund behind its futures market had to be rescued with public and private money. CCPs reduce risk, but they can fail too.

Key takeaways

  • Through novation a CCP becomes buyer to every seller and seller to every buyer, replacing a web of exposures with a hub.
  • Multilateral netting cuts the amounts that must be paid and the exposures firms carry.
  • Variation margin settles losses daily; initial margin covers the cost of closing out a defaulter.
  • The default waterfall runs: defaulter's margin and fund contribution, CCP capital, survivors' default fund, then assessments.
  • CCPs, depositories and payment systems are market utilities, supervised closely under the PFMI.

Reaction

Check what stuck

Question 1 · objective 2

X owes Y $50m, Y owes Z $50m and Z owes X $30m. If all three clear through a CCP, how much in total must be paid to the CCP, in $ millions?

$m

Question 2 · objective 3

A member defaults with a close-out loss of €500m. Its initial margin is €350m, its default fund contribution €40m, and the CCP's skin in the game €20m. How much do the other members lose, in € millions?

€m

Question 3 · objective 1

Bank A sells a futures contract to Bank B, and the trade is cleared. Who is Bank A's counterparty afterwards?

Question 4 · objective 3

Which is used first when a clearing member defaults?

Question 5 · objective 4

Which of these is a central securities depository rather than a CCP?

Glossary

Counterparty risk
The risk that the other side of a trade fails before it has paid everything it owes.
Central counterparty (CCP)
Central counterparty: an institution that becomes the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer in the trades it clears.
Novation
Replacing one contract with two: the original trade between two firms becomes two trades, each with the CCP.
Clearing member
A firm, usually a large bank or broker, that deals directly with a CCP and stands behind its own and its clients' trades.
Netting
Offsetting what a firm owes against what it is owed, so only the difference has to be paid.
Variation margin
Variation margin: cash paid every day (or more often) to cover the change in a position's value.
Initial margin
Initial margin: collateral posted up front to cover the loss the CCP could suffer while closing out a defaulter's positions.
Default fund
Default fund: a pool every member pays into, used to cover a defaulter's losses beyond its own margin.
Skin in the game
Skin in the game: some of the CCP's own capital, placed in the waterfall to give it a reason to manage risk well.
Default waterfall
The fixed order in which resources are used to absorb a defaulting member's losses.
Central securities depository
Central securities depository: the institution that records who owns which securities and transfers them at settlement.
FMI
Financial market infrastructure: the systems that clear, settle and record payments and trades.

Deep Dives & Origins

Deep Dives

  • Hull, Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives (Pearson), the chapters on futures markets and central clearing. Beginner.
  • Pirrong, The Economics of Central Clearing: Theory and Practice, ISDA Discussion Papers No. 1, 2011. Intermediate.

Origins

  • CPMI-IOSCO, Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures, BIS, April 2012.
  • G20 Leaders' Statement, Pittsburgh Summit, September 2009.
  • Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (EMIR) and Regulation (EU) 2021/23 (CCP recovery and resolution).
  • LCH.Clearnet, statements on the Lehman Brothers default management, 2008; Bank of England, Financial Stability Report, October 2008.
  • Nasdaq Clearing, statements on the member default of September 2018.

Watch this lesson

Video version

Prefer to watch? The same lesson as a 10-minute video will sit here, made from this page's script.